On Feb 28, 2013, at 11:47 AM, leo wrote: > Thanks Adrian. > > There was a sense in my question, having the RTP traffic P2P would be > translated in: > 1) better user experience, less jitter and latency. > 2) saving to install one or more mediaproxies. Considering that all RTP > traffic will pass on them, they will need to have high bandwidth (symmetric > up/down) and maybe CPU/RAM. >
Fixing the signaling is not enough because the media flows through different ports and with symmetric NATs you don't know what ports those will be. To (try to) use P2P media you need your endpoints to use ICE. MediaProxy is ICE aware, so if it detects that media is flowing P2P it will bail out. You can find more information about this here: http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/ICE Regards, -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
