Hello,
As always, the truth is in the middle.
I agree RTPP is behind on certain things (and this is why we want to do
them), but on the other hand it is a good platform with other good
features (missing on the other relays). RTPP has better ability in
individually controlling the stream (audio /video), ability to set
timeouts and onhold with no conflicts, ability to generates events on
timeout, more flexibility in handling symmetric / asymmetric NATs,
ability to do media injection (playback), ability to do call recording
What neither mediaproxy, nor rtpengine have is a mechanism for
implementing RTP failover (for ongoing calls) or restart persistence .
This is something we want to look into. I would love to have ICE and
WebRTC on my media relay, for the HA and persistence are more important
I would say.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 24.05.2014 01:59, Muhammad Shahzad Shafi wrote:
To be honest, i have stopped using rtpproxy for over 2 years now. It
is not evolving as fast as it should be, specially in the context of
ICE and WebRTC technologies.
I would like to suggest that opensips team should consider adding
support for rtpengine from SIPWise,
https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine
For now mediaproxy from AG Projects is the only good choice for
handling media in opensips with ICE support (though it still lacks
WebRTC features).
Thank you.
On 2014-05-23 14:55, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Going for a public exposure on this question to Maxim, maybe we will
get an answer here.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RTPproxy project
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:03:31 +0300
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
To: Maxim Sobolev
CC: Razvan Crainea
Hello Maxim,
Long time, no talks, but I hope everything is fine on your side.
I'm reaching you in order to ask about your future plans in regards to
the rtpproxy project? We see no much activity around it and other media
relays are popping around.
RTPP is an essential component for us, we invested a lot of work, we
have many patches (extensions) for it (which we want to push to the
public tree, but there is no answer on this) and we are also looking for
investing a lot into big future plans (as adding more functionalities).
Now, my question is - what is your commitment and disponibility for the
RTPP project ? depending on that we what to re-position ourselves, as we
do not want to waste time and work on things which are out of control.
Best regards,
--
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Muhammad Shahzad
-----------------------------------
CISCO Rich Media Communication Specialist (CRMCS)
CISCO Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
Cell: +49 176 99 83 10 85
MSN: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
