Brett, you put the finger on the wound :)
I looked around to other alternatives (to avoid re-inventing the wheel)
- like mediaproxy or rtpengine - and I saw no carrier-grade features in
the there - please correct me if I'm wrong.
I'm looking to see if the problem is correctly identified and if there
is a large consent in the community about this need. As we would like to
through some resources into this (hopefully other parties too), as
ideally we should be going in the right direction :)
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 27.05.2014 16:52, Brett Nemeroff wrote:
Just wanted to add my 0.02 here..
I totally agree with Bogdan. For the applications where opensips + a
RTP relay make sense, HA and persistence are much more important.
WebRTC and ICE are kinda applications in of themselves. And although
these applications are going to grow in popularity, the "legacy" needs
for an RTP relay are still massively prevalent in the space. A general
push towards "Carrier Grade", resiliency and redundancy I think is
much better for the project as a whole.
Not only that, consider that applications requiring ICE or WebRTC will
greatly benefit from HA / persistence, but not so much the other way
around :)
YMMV
-Brett
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello,
As always, the truth is in the middle.
I agree RTPP is behind on certain things (and this is why we want
to do them), but on the other hand it is a good platform with
other good features (missing on the other relays). RTPP has better
ability in individually controlling the stream (audio /video),
ability to set timeouts and onhold with no conflicts, ability to
generates events on timeout, more flexibility in handling
symmetric / asymmetric NATs, ability to do media injection
(playback), ability to do call recording
What neither mediaproxy, nor rtpengine have is a mechanism for
implementing RTP failover (for ongoing calls) or restart
persistence . This is something we want to look into. I would love
to have ICE and WebRTC on my media relay, for the HA and
persistence are more important I would say.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 24.05.2014 01 <tel:24.05.2014%2001>:59, Muhammad Shahzad Shafi
wrote:
To be honest, i have stopped using rtpproxy for over 2 years now.
It is not evolving as fast as it should be, specially in the
context of ICE and WebRTC technologies.
I would like to suggest that opensips team should consider adding
support for rtpengine from SIPWise,
https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine
For now mediaproxy from AG Projects is the only good choice for
handling media in opensips with ICE support (though it still
lacks WebRTC features).
Thank you.
On 2014-05-23 14:55, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Going for a public exposure on this question to Maxim, maybe we
will get an answer here.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RTPproxy project
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:03:31 +0300
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
To: Maxim Sobolev
CC: Razvan Crainea
Hello Maxim,
Long time, no talks, but I hope everything is fine on your side.
I'm reaching you in order to ask about your future plans in regards to
the rtpproxy project? We see no much activity around it and other media
relays are popping around.
RTPP is an essential component for us, we invested a lot of work, we
have many patches (extensions) for it (which we want to push to the
public tree, but there is no answer on this) and we are also looking for
investing a lot into big future plans (as adding more functionalities).
Now, my question is - what is your commitment and disponibility for the
RTPP project ? depending on that we what to re-position ourselves, as we
do not want to waste time and work on things which are out of control.
Best regards,
--
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Muhammad Shahzad
-----------------------------------
CISCO Rich Media Communication Specialist (CRMCS)
CISCO Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
Cell:+49 176 99 83 10 85 <tel:%2B49%20176%2099%2083%2010%2085>
MSN:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Email:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
