Denis,
Sowhat you want to do is to be able to serial and parallel (combined)
having carriers as elements in the list (and not GWs).
With the solution I gave you cannot do it as you cannot usecarriers in
the definition of another carrier(when doing the parallel group), right ?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 21.08.2015 16:14, dpa wrote:
No, Bogdan, everything fine. You wright understand my question.
I wanted “do a combination between serial and parallel selection” but
method you suggest doesn`t fit to me.
The main reason I have many providers and using carrier for “sharing”
doesn`t convenient, because I must have all possible combination of
carriers and using (remember) it for making routing table (contents of
routing table formed by another system, and I do not want complicate it).
Thank you.
*From:*Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Friday, August 21, 2015 3:52 PM
*To:* dpa; 'OpenSIPS users mailling list'
*Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips1.11 dr_routing
Denis,
I had the impression that I haven't managed to answer to your
question. Maybe because I do not fully understand the question. Could
you detail why the solution I gave does not fit you?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 21.08.2015 15:35, dpa wrote:
Hello Bogdan!
I understand and I thought about it before. But it doesn`t fit to
me, because I have many prefix which can “sharing” different carriers.
Anyway, thank you for help.
*From:*Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Friday, August 21, 2015 3:29 PM
*To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips1.11 dr_routing
Hi Denis,
If you use weights alg and the GW has no weight, a 0 weight will
be assumed, so it will never match (unless after a failover).
Using weights, the selection is over all the GW in the set.
If you want do a combination between serial and parallel selection
, you need to use carriers:
Make carrier X with wights flags and set for it destinations
34=50,35=50
and in the rule have the destination set "14,#X" (and do not use
the W flag anymore)
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 21.08.2015 12:16, dpa wrote:
Hello!
There is one question about dr_routing module.
Example 1.
I have such gw_list “#14,#34=50,#35=50,#2881”
Example 2.
I have such gw_list “#14,#34,#35,#2881”
I am using d_routing() with W flag.
In Example 1 a call first had been sent to sharing between #34
and #35 and only then to #14.
In Example 2 a call first had been sent to #14, then #34, then
#35 and #2881.
Is there any way to tell Opensips in Example 1 first sends
calls to #14 and only then to sharing between #34 and #35?
Thank you for any help.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
