Hi Denis,

Currently you cannot do this, but I see 2 options:

1) allow a carrier definition to contain other carriers (max 3 levels)
2) have a more complex syntax in destination set definition, with brackets, like:
#14,(#34=50,#35=50),#2881

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 24.08.2015 10:42, dpa wrote:

Hello Bogdan!

Yes, you are right, I want use only carriers in routing.

For example.

I have for providers

#14, #34, #35, #2881.

Let`s  say that the goal of some prefix is

Prefix “9087”: #14 – 1$, #34-2$, #35 – 2$, #2881 – 3$

Prefix “8765”: #34-1$, #35-2$, #14-3$, #2881 – 3$

In ideal I want to see in routing table:

9087 #14,#34=50,#35=50,#2881

8765 #34,#35,#14=50,#2881=50

First Opensips make serial routing and then parallel.

In method you gave I must create carriers:

34=50, 35=50

34=33, 35=33, 2881=33 an so on.

And all these carriers I must remember in another system (which forms routing table) and using it during forming routing table.

*From:*Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Friday, August 21, 2015 4:35 PM
*To:* dpa; 'OpenSIPS users mailling list'
*Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips1.11 dr_routing

Denis,

So what you want to do is to be able to serial and parallel (combined) having carriers as elements in the list (and not GWs).

With the solution I gave you cannot do it as you cannot use carriers in the definition of another carrier (when doing the parallel group), right ?

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 21.08.2015 16:14, dpa wrote:

    No, Bogdan, everything fine. You wright understand my question.

    I wanted “do a combination between serial and parallel selection”
    but method you suggest doesn`t fit to me.

    The main reason I have many providers and using carrier for
    “sharing” doesn`t convenient, because I must have all possible
    combination of carriers and using (remember) it for making routing
    table (contents of routing table formed by another system, and I
    do not want complicate it).

    Thank you.

    *From:*Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:[email protected]]
    *Sent:* Friday, August 21, 2015 3:52 PM
    *To:* dpa; 'OpenSIPS users mailling list'
    *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips1.11 dr_routing

    Denis,

    I had the impression that I haven't managed to answer to your
    question. Maybe because I do not fully understand the question.
    Could you detail why the solution I gave does not fit you?

    Regards,


    Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

    OpenSIPS Founder and Developer

    http://www.opensips-solutions.com

    On 21.08.2015 15:35, dpa wrote:

        Hello Bogdan!

        I understand and I thought about it before. But it doesn`t fit
        to me, because I have many prefix which can “sharing”
        different carriers.

        Anyway, thank you for help.

        *From:*Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:[email protected]]
        *Sent:* Friday, August 21, 2015 3:29 PM
        *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list; [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips1.11 dr_routing

        Hi Denis,

        If you use weights alg and the GW has no weight, a 0 weight
        will be assumed, so it will never match (unless after a failover).

        Using weights, the selection is over all the GW in the set.

        If you want do a combination between serial and parallel
        selection , you need to use carriers:

        Make carrier X with wights flags and set for it destinations
        34=50,35=50
        and in the rule have the destination set "14,#X" (and do not
        use the W flag anymore)

        Regards,



        Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

        OpenSIPS Founder and Developer

        http://www.opensips-solutions.com

        On 21.08.2015 12:16, dpa wrote:

            Hello!

            There is one question about dr_routing module.

            Example 1.

            I have such gw_list “#14,#34=50,#35=50,#2881”

            Example 2.

            I have such gw_list “#14,#34,#35,#2881”

            I am using d_routing() with W flag.

            In Example 1 a call first had been sent to sharing between
            #34 and #35 and only then to #14.

            In Example 2 a call first had been sent to #14, then #34,
            then #35 and #2881.

            Is there any way to tell Opensips in Example 1 first sends
            calls to #14 and only then to sharing between #34 and #35?

            Thank you for any help.






            _______________________________________________

            Users mailing list

            [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>

            http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to