Hi John,

I investigated some traces from our old platform and I found a call
with a private VIA and the Re-Invite is done correctly.
You can find the trace here: http://siptrace.rolbox.net/ok.html
The trace with the broken Re-Invite here: http://siptrace.rolbox.net/ko.html

Kind regards,
Julian Santer
Raiffeisen OnLine

Am 29.04.2016 um 15:56 schrieb Johan De Clercq:
I don;t think so : force_rport just adds the port on which you receive to the 
first via header.

2016-04-29 15:36 GMT+02:00 Julian Santer <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:

    We are using 2.1.2
    So we made a "huge" version update and also changed the kind of working

    Am 29.04.2016 um 14:27 schrieb Johan De Clercq:

        What version do you use in your new install ?

        2016-04-29 13:12 GMT+02:00 Julian Santer <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>:

             Hi Johan,

             we changed our platform 2 weeks ago from 1 OpenSips Proxy 1.6.4 to 
3 OpenSips instances with topology hiding.
             Since we didn't have this problems earlier, I think it worked with 
the old platform.
             As we call force_rport() in the main_route, the private IP in the 
VIA header should be ignored, right?
             At the moment we call force_rport() in all our instances.
             I think, we should call force_rport() only on the edge server 
where we make the nat_handling, right?

             Kind regards,
             Julian Santer
             Raiffeisen OnLIne


             Am 29.04.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Johan De Clercq:

                 Indeed.


                 2016-04-29 9:49 GMT+02:00 Julian Santer <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
                 <mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>>>:

                      Hi Johan,

                      as the asterisk is not administrated by us, I have to ask 
the customer.
                      As I understand you think the problem should be the 
private IP in the VIA header
                      and this should be fixed with STUN, right?

                      Kind regards,
                      Julian Santer
                      Raiffeisen OnLine

                      Am 29.04.2016 um 09:17 schrieb Johan De Clercq:

                          do you use stun on the phones ?

                          2016-04-29 9:14 GMT+02:00 Julian Santer 
<[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
                 <mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>>
                          <mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                 <mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>>>>>:

                               Hi guys,

                               we are using OpenSips 2.1.2 with topology_hiding.
                               Now we got trouble with Re-Invites, which are routed to 
the private IP from the "from".
                               The topology_hiding matches, but the Re-Invite is sent to 
the private IP from the "from".
                               Have we to call lookup again on the 
registrar/core, when we got a Re-Invite?
                               You can find the trace under 
http://siptrace.rolbox.net/siptrace.html

                               Kind regards,
                               Julian Santer
                               Raiffeisen OnLine


                               _______________________________________________
                               Users mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
                 <mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>>>
                          <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
                 <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L 
<mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L> <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L
        <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L>>/[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
                 <mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>>>>
        http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users







                      _______________________________________________
                      Users mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
                 <mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L 
<mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L>/[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>>
        http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users







             _______________________________________________
             Users mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L/[email protected]>>
        http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users







    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users







_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to