I don;t think so : force_rport just adds the port on which you
receive to the first via header.
2016-04-29 15:36 GMT+02:00 Julian Santer <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
We are using 2.1.2
So we made a "huge" version update and also changed the kind of
working
Am 29.04.2016 um 14:27 schrieb Johan De Clercq:
What version do you use in your new install ?
2016-04-29 13:12 GMT+02:00 Julian Santer
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>:
Hi Johan,
we changed our platform 2 weeks ago from 1 OpenSips
Proxy 1.6.4 to 3 OpenSips instances with topology hiding.
Since we didn't have this problems earlier, I think it
worked with the old platform.
As we call force_rport() in the main_route, the private
IP in the VIA header should be ignored, right?
At the moment we call force_rport() in all our instances.
I think, we should call force_rport() only on the edge
server where we make the nat_handling, right?
Kind regards,
Julian Santer
Raiffeisen OnLIne
Am 29.04.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Johan De Clercq:
Indeed.
2016-04-29 9:49 GMT+02:00 Julian Santer
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>>:
Hi Johan,
as the asterisk is not administrated by us, I
have to ask the customer.
As I understand you think the problem should be
the private IP in the VIA header
and this should be fixed with STUN, right?
Kind regards,
Julian Santer
Raiffeisen OnLine
Am 29.04.2016 um 09:17 schrieb Johan De Clercq:
do you use stun on the phones ?
2016-04-29 9:14 GMT+02:00 Julian Santer
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>>>:
Hi guys,
we are using OpenSips 2.1.2 with
topology_hiding.
Now we got trouble with Re-Invites,
which are routed to the private IP from the "from".
The topology_hiding matches, but the
Re-Invite is sent to the private IP from the "from".
Have we to call lookup again on the
registrar/core, when we got a Re-Invite?
You can find the trace under
http://siptrace.rolbox.net/siptrace.html
Kind regards,
Julian Santer
Raiffeisen OnLine
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L
<mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L> <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L
<mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L>>/[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L
<mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L>/[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L/[email protected]>>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users