@Max, yes I am sure. Did some traces...

That is way I asked what I could be doing wrong. I read that there is an issue doing it with rtpproxy in bridge, but in my case it is not in bridge.


tnx

miha


On 31/05/2016 15:02, Max Mühlbronner wrote:
Hi,


@Miha: Are you sure that it does not automatically set the rtpproxies for 200OK & ACK?

@Sasmita: According to the documentation it is not necessary to invoke engage_rtp_proxy() for replies as this is handled by the dialog module.


"Function must only be called for the initial INVITE and internally takes care of rewriting the body of 200 OKs and ACKs. "



Best Regards

Max M.


On 31.05.2016 14:42, Miha wrote:
@Sasmita, totally clear :)

I asked wrong question :)


What is the difference between using engage_rtp_proxy() or using rtpproxy_offer(), rtpproxy_answer()?


tnx

miha


On 31/05/2016 14:39, Sasmita Panda wrote:
If you are using in INVITE , then it should be offer . Because firstly we are offering media to someone . If its 200 Ok then it will be answer because the 2nd party is answering the call .

If there is no sdp in INVITE but in ACK , then it will get reversed . In 200 OK you should offer and in ACK you have to answer .
This can be done in loop .

     I hope I make you understand .

*/Thanks & Regards/*
/Sasmita Panda/
/Network Testing and Software Engineer/
/3CLogic , ph:07827611765/

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Miha <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    ok tnx. I understand documentation on wrong way.

But then, what is the difference with using rtpproxy offer, answer ?


    br

    mia


    On 31/05/2016 14:17, Sasmita Panda wrote:
    If there is sdp in ACK and u wanted to engage rtp proxy , the
     you have to write it inside ACK also ... By writing for INVITE
    cant help you to update ACK also . For 200 OK , you must write it
    in reply route .

    */Thanks & Regards/*
    /Sasmita Panda/
    /Network Testing and Software Engineer/
    /3CLogic , ph:07827611765/

    On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Johan De Clercq
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        put it also in reply route.

        2016-05-31 13:42 GMT+02:00 Miha <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:

            HI

            if I use engage_rtp_proxy(), I can use it only on initial
            INVITE and opensips should automatically rewritten also
            200 OK and ACK with SDP, right?
            But when I am using this function, I can see from trace
            that only SDP for initial invite is rewritten, 200 ok
            with sdp is not changed. Must I do something else?

            Rtpproxy is not running in bridge mode.


            tnx
            miha



            _______________________________________________
            Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



        _______________________________________________
        Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to