Hi Bogdan.
Just to follow up I have been trying to make openSIPS send SIP options in the
same environment to websocket registered users, and I just cant get it to send
even though the branch flags are set.
I now have these settings defined for NAThelper;
loadmodule "nathelper.so"
modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 10)
modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 0)
modparam("nathelper", "sipping_method", "OPTIONS")
modparam("nathelper", "sipping_bflag", "SIPPING_ENABLE")
modparam("nathelper", "sipping_from", "sip:pinger@<domain>")
modparam("nathelper", "received_avp", "$avp(rcv)")
modparam("nathelper", "ping_threshold", 5)
modparam("nathelper", "max_pings_lost", 3)
modparam("nathelper", "natping_partitions", 4)
modparam("nathelper", "remove_on_timeout_bflag", "SIPPING_RTO")
modparam("nathelper", "natping_tcp", 1)
modparam("nathelper", "cluster_id", 1)
modparam("nathelper", "cluster_sharing_tag", "node/2=active")
Also have pinging_mode set for usrloc, and this is in a
federation-cachedb-cluster with 2 opensips containers running active/active.
If I use t_new_request I can send a SIP OPTIONS message out, so I assume I am
missing a parameter or its mis configuration? Or could it be environment, this
is a k8s setup.
Any advice/tips would be great.
Thank you .
Jon
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows
From: Jonathan Hunter<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: 25 April 2022 15:28
To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu<mailto:[email protected]>; OpenSIPS users mailling
list<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Clustering Presence opensips 3.2/3.3 in K8s
environment
Hi Bogdan,
Thank you for the reply I can see there are tcp connections but I don’t seem to
get anything. I assume it may well be k8s related?.
I also cant seem to get NAT ping working, I assume this should work out to
websocket connections as long as flags are set?
The outputs are;
"ID": 1317975555,
"Type": "ws",
"State": 0,
"Remote": "10.10.51.228:35462",
"Local": "10.10.2.91:8081",
"Lifetime": "2022-04-25 14:11:31",
"Alias port": 35462
}
]
And location shows;
"AORs": [
{
"AOR": "61067470a372a031a7495a1a@<DOMAIN>",
"Contacts": [
{
"Contact":
"sip:[email protected];transport=wss",
"ContactID": "4544061655272656153",
"Expires": 519,
"Q": "",
"Callid": "jbbvtjp2l7bujcom73s3",
"Cseq": 2,
"User-agent": "SIP.js/0.20.0",
"Received": "sip:10.10.51.228:35462;transport=ws",
"State": "CS_NEW",
"Flags": 0,
"Cflags": "WS_DEVICE SIPPING_RTO SIPPING_ENABLE",
"Socket": "ws:<PUBLIC_IP>:8081",
"Methods": 5439
}
]
}
]
However I cant seem to also get opensips to send SIP keepalive with these
settings;
#### NAThelper module
loadmodule "nathelper.so"
modparam("nathelper", "received_avp", "$avp(rcv)")
modparam("nathelper", "natping_tcp",1)
modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 5)
modparam("nathelper", "sipping_bflag", "SIPPING_ENABLE")
modparam("nathelper", "remove_on_timeout_bflag", "SIPPING_RTO")
modparam("nathelper", "sipping_from", "sip:pinger@DOMAIN")
modparam("nathelper", "max_pings_lost", 2)
modparam("nathelper", "cluster_id", 9)
modparam("nathelper", "cluster_sharing_tag", "node/2=active")
Am I missing something here?
Many thanks
Jon
Sent from
Mail<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5f60e807488b4d6ea4d808da26c7ce66%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637864936873242045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YMJHNUhsr8ZgxUJ4o5gqoqgQ7iibcDmc5tDsnUISgzk%3D&reserved=0>
for Windows
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: 18 April 2022 13:59
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list<mailto:[email protected]>; Jonathan
Hunter<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Clustering Presence opensips 3.2/3.3 in K8s
environment
Hi Jonathan,
Maybe the k8s layer (the ingress ??) sticks its tails in there - could you
check at opensips level if the TCP conn is still seen as up ? Use the mi
list_tcp_conns MI function
https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Interface-CoreMI-3-2#toc4<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.opensips.org%2FDocumentation%2FInterface-CoreMI-3-2%23toc4&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5f60e807488b4d6ea4d808da26c7ce66%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637864936873242045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=DaErQEB7DGSLVwpPR3HwQVrHx1g7RUR9r%2Bc6AV6A%2BFU%3D&reserved=0>
Best regard,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.opensips-solutions.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5f60e807488b4d6ea4d808da26c7ce66%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637864936873242045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=d5VsC%2FRMENJY5m57ENjK2sKxvRdkF9JoH%2FLOfwiEes8%3D&reserved=0>
OpenSIPS eBootcamp 23rd May - 3rd June 2022
https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2022/<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fopensips.org%2Ftraining%2FOpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2022%2F&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5f60e807488b4d6ea4d808da26c7ce66%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637864936873242045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FGY1N1i45n0icTFg2%2BlUufXx8BtfR%2F0C73ZO72GfW60%3D&reserved=0>
On 4/13/22 6:08 PM, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
Hi All,
Has anyone managed to get presence working when using an active/active opensips
setup with k8s ?
Everything works apart from presence, In particular when a websocket user
disconnects due to a client crash.
I ideally would want to use event_route[E_CORE_TCP_DISCONNECT] to then grab the
disconnect when it comes in via websockets/tcp, however I cant seem to get it
to trigger. Could this be due to the underlying hooks OpenSIPS uses to interact
with with OS with TCP or something else?
As I would use the event route, to then remove the registration from the
location table, as otherwise I have duplicate entries in both location and the
presentity list.
Is this something anyone else has encountered?
I have tried using clustering with both presence and pua and have same issues,
whereby after an unwanted disconnect subsequent NOTIFY messages contain more
than one id per entity;
<presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
entity="sip:61067470a372a031a7495a1a@domain"<sip:61067470a372a031a7495a1a@domain>>
<tuple xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
id="0x7ffe75896760"><status><basic>open</basic></status></tuple><tuple
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
id="0x7ffd0716b390"><status><basic>open</basic></status></tuple></presence>
I need to stop this occurring ideally, any help much appreciated.
Many thanks
Jon
Sent from
Mail<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5f60e807488b4d6ea4d808da26c7ce66%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637864936873242045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YMJHNUhsr8ZgxUJ4o5gqoqgQ7iibcDmc5tDsnUISgzk%3D&reserved=0>
for Windows
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.opensips.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusers&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5f60e807488b4d6ea4d808da26c7ce66%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637864936873242045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=jJQnvSjbFbr78OBer49%2FNGpMxRqMOR7IG1Fknau5u6o%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
