Hi Jonathan,

If you set log level to 4 (DBG), do you see any logs when the pinging should be attempted ?

Best Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
  https://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS eBootcamp 23rd May - 3rd June 2022
  https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2022/

On 4/27/22 12:30 AM, Jonathan Hunter wrote:

Hi Bogdan.

Just to follow up I have been trying to make openSIPS send SIP options in the same environment to websocket registered users, and I just cant get it to send even though the branch flags are set.

I now have these settings defined for NAThelper;

loadmodule "nathelper.so"

modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 10)

modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 0)

modparam("nathelper", "sipping_method", "OPTIONS")

modparam("nathelper", "sipping_bflag", "SIPPING_ENABLE")

modparam("nathelper", "sipping_from", "sip:pinger@<domain>")

modparam("nathelper", "received_avp", "$avp(rcv)")

modparam("nathelper", "ping_threshold", 5)

modparam("nathelper", "max_pings_lost", 3)

modparam("nathelper", "natping_partitions", 4)

modparam("nathelper", "remove_on_timeout_bflag", "SIPPING_RTO")

modparam("nathelper", "natping_tcp", 1)

modparam("nathelper", "cluster_id", 1)

modparam("nathelper", "cluster_sharing_tag", "node/2=active")

Also have pinging_mode set for usrloc, and this is in a federation-cachedb-cluster with 2 opensips containers running active/active.

If I use t_new_request I can send a SIP OPTIONS message out, so I assume I am missing a parameter or its mis configuration? Or could it be environment, this is a k8s setup.

Any advice/tips would be great.

Thank you .

Jon

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

*From: *Jonathan Hunter <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *25 April 2022 15:28
*To: *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <mailto:[email protected]>; OpenSIPS users mailling list <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Clustering Presence opensips 3.2/3.3 in K8s environment

Hi Bogdan,

Thank you for the reply I can see there are tcp connections but I don’t seem to get anything. I assume it may well be k8s related?.

I also cant seem to get NAT ping working, I assume this should work out to websocket connections as long as flags are set?

The outputs are;

  "ID": 1317975555,

            "Type": "ws",

            "State": 0,

            "Remote": "10.10.51.228:35462",

            "Local": "10.10.2.91:8081",

            "Lifetime": "2022-04-25 14:11:31",

            "Alias port": 35462

        }

    ]

And location shows;

"AORs": [

                {

                    "AOR": "61067470a372a031a7495a1a@<DOMAIN>",

                    "Contacts": [

                        {

                            "Contact": "sip:[email protected];transport=wss",

                            "ContactID": "4544061655272656153",

                            "Expires": 519,

                            "Q": "",

                            "Callid": "jbbvtjp2l7bujcom73s3",

                            "Cseq": 2,

                            "User-agent": "SIP.js/0.20.0",

                            "Received": "sip:10.10.51.228:35462;transport=ws",

                            "State": "CS_NEW",

                            "Flags": 0,

                            "Cflags": "WS_DEVICE SIPPING_RTO SIPPING_ENABLE",

                            "Socket": "ws:<PUBLIC_IP>:8081",

                            "Methods": 5439

                        }

                    ]

                }

            ]

However I cant seem to also get opensips to send SIP keepalive with these settings;

#### NAThelper module

loadmodule "nathelper.so"

modparam("nathelper", "received_avp", "$avp(rcv)")

modparam("nathelper", "natping_tcp",1)

modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 5)

modparam("nathelper", "sipping_bflag", "SIPPING_ENABLE")

modparam("nathelper", "remove_on_timeout_bflag", "SIPPING_RTO")

modparam("nathelper", "sipping_from", "sip:pinger@DOMAIN")

modparam("nathelper", "max_pings_lost", 2)

modparam("nathelper", "cluster_id", 9)

modparam("nathelper", "cluster_sharing_tag", "node/2=active")

Am I missing something here?

Many thanks

Jon

Sent from Mail <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5f60e807488b4d6ea4d808da26c7ce66%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637864936873242045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YMJHNUhsr8ZgxUJ4o5gqoqgQ7iibcDmc5tDsnUISgzk%3D&reserved=0> for Windows

*From: *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *18 April 2022 13:59
*To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <mailto:[email protected]>; Jonathan Hunter <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Clustering Presence opensips 3.2/3.3 in K8s environment

Hi Jonathan,

Maybe the k8s layer (the ingress ??) sticks its tails in there - could you check at opensips level if the TCP conn is still seen as up ? Use the mi list_tcp_conns MI function https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Interface-CoreMI-3-2#toc4 <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.opensips.org%2FDocumentation%2FInterface-CoreMI-3-2%23toc4&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5f60e807488b4d6ea4d808da26c7ce66%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637864936873242045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=DaErQEB7DGSLVwpPR3HwQVrHx1g7RUR9r%2Bc6AV6A%2BFU%3D&reserved=0>


Best regard,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
   https://www.opensips-solutions.com  
<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.opensips-solutions.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5f60e807488b4d6ea4d808da26c7ce66%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637864936873242045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=d5VsC%2FRMENJY5m57ENjK2sKxvRdkF9JoH%2FLOfwiEes8%3D&reserved=0>
OpenSIPS eBootcamp 23rd May - 3rd June 2022
   https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2022/  
<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fopensips.org%2Ftraining%2FOpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2022%2F&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5f60e807488b4d6ea4d808da26c7ce66%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637864936873242045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FGY1N1i45n0icTFg2%2BlUufXx8BtfR%2F0C73ZO72GfW60%3D&reserved=0>

On 4/13/22 6:08 PM, Jonathan Hunter wrote:

    Hi All,

    Has anyone managed to get presence working when using an
    active/active opensips setup with k8s ?

    Everything works apart from presence, In particular when a
    websocket user disconnects due to a client crash.

    I ideally would want to use event_route[E_CORE_TCP_DISCONNECT] to
    then grab the disconnect when it comes in via websockets/tcp,
    however I cant seem to get it to trigger. Could this be due to the
    underlying hooks OpenSIPS uses to interact with with OS with TCP
    or something else?

    As I would use the event route, to then remove the registration
    from the location table, as otherwise I have duplicate entries in
    both location and the presentity list.

    Is this something anyone else has encountered?

    I have tried using clustering with both presence and pua and have
    same issues, whereby after an unwanted disconnect subsequent
    NOTIFY messages contain more than one id per entity;

    <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
    entity="sip:61067470a372a031a7495a1a@domain"
    <sip:61067470a372a031a7495a1a@domain>>

    <tuple xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
    id="0x7ffe75896760"><status><basic>open</basic></status></tuple><tuple
    xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
    id="0x7ffd0716b390"><status><basic>open</basic></status></tuple></presence>

    I need to stop this occurring ideally, any help much appreciated.

    Many thanks

    Jon

    Sent from Mail
    
<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5f60e807488b4d6ea4d808da26c7ce66%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637864936873242045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YMJHNUhsr8ZgxUJ4o5gqoqgQ7iibcDmc5tDsnUISgzk%3D&reserved=0>
    for Windows

    _______________________________________________

    Users mailing list

    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>

    http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users  
<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.opensips.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusers&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5f60e807488b4d6ea4d808da26c7ce66%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637864936873242045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=jJQnvSjbFbr78OBer49%2FNGpMxRqMOR7IG1Fknau5u6o%3D&reserved=0>


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to