Hi Bogdan, Will fix_nated_register() overwrite results of a fix_nated_contact()?
Second question - for 'OPTIONS' where Contact is available - should fix_nated_contact() replace it with the correct one? Where exactly does this function take the value to replace Contact with - from '$avp(received)' param? So it won't do anything if, for example, OPTIONS packet comes from my LAN Asterisk server and reaches the OpenSIPS LAN interface? Even though nat_uac_test(7) would confirm a RFC1918 private address fix_nated_contact() can't do much in this case, is that correct? Thanks a lot for your help! Best regards, Yury. On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 6:25 PM Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Yury, > > For a REGISTER you should use the fix_nated_register() function. > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > https://www.opensips-solutions.com > OpenSIPS eBootcamp 23rd May - 3rd June 2022 > https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2022/ > > On 5/2/22 8:07 PM, Yury Kirsanov wrote: > > Hi Bogdan, > No, nothing in OpenSIPS logs, unfortunately. > > Here's another log, I'm doing 'fix_nated_register' in this case at the > REGISTER route and doing 'fix_nated_contact()' at the very beginning of my > script, just for the testing purpose. > > May 3 03:00:48 [REGISTER] [123456->123456] Forwarding REGISTER from > sip:[email protected]:5060, requested Expries: 60 to main registrar at > sip:172.16.4.22:5060 (84327f479c5d50e1634422f72a0b7619) > May 3 03:00:48 [REPLY] [123456->123456] REGISTER 401 Unauthorized > FROM 172.16.4.22:5060 (84327f479c5d50e1634422f72a0b7619) > May 3 03:00:48 [REGISTER] [123456->123456] Request from > 1XX.1XX.1XX.1XX:8001, domain domain.com (84327f479c5d50e1634422f72a0b7619) > May 3 03:00:48 [REGISTER] [123456->123456] Forwarding REGISTER from > sip:[email protected]:5060, requested Expries: 60 to main registrar at > sip:172.16.4.22:5060 (84327f479c5d50e1634422f72a0b7619) > May 3 03:00:48 [REPLY] [123456->123456] REGISTER 200 OK FROM > 172.16.4.22:5060 (84327f479c5d50e1634422f72a0b7619) > May 3 03:00:48 [REGREPLY] [123456->123456] Reply from > 172.16.4.22:5060, code is 200 - OK, saving contact > (84327f479c5d50e1634422f72a0b7619) > May 3 03:00:48 [EVENT] Inserting contact sip:[email protected]:8001 > (569f6c324981335e0b33daf8fc88ed77) > May 3 03:00:51 [OPTIONS] OPTIONS request from 172.16.4.22:5060 to > sip:[email protected]:5060, fu is sip:[email protected] > May 3 03:00:51 [OPTIONS] [123456->123456] SIP device > sip:[email protected] found, relaying to sip:1XX.1XX.1XX.1XX:8001 > (76f4319976c85e45b2ff916581912550) > > No errors in OpenSIPS logs. Here's output of 'opensips-cli -x mi fifo > ul_dump': > > "AORs": [ > { > "AOR": "123456", > "Contacts": [ > { > "Contact": "sip:[email protected]:8001", > "ContactID": "3713509073413807284", > "Expires": 47, > "Q": "", > "Callid": "6_3941098626", > "Cseq": 2, > "User-agent": "Yealink SIP-T46G 28.83.0.120", > "Received": "sip:1XX.1XX.1XX.1XX:8001", > "State": "CS_SYNC", > "Flags": 0, > "Cflags": "", > "Socket": "udp:1XX.1XX.1XX.1XX:5060", > "Methods": 16383 > } > ] > } > > Thanks and best regards, > Yury. > > On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 12:29 AM Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Are there any errors when the "fixing" is done? The presence of a param >> should not impact here. >> >> Regards, >> Bogdan >> >> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu >> >> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer >> https://www.opensips-solutions.com >> OpenSIPS eBootcamp 23rd May - 3rd June 2022 >> https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2022/ >> >> On 4/29/22 1:43 PM, Yury Kirsanov wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I'm using OpenSIPS 3.2.4 and recently run into following issue: >> >> Imagine simplest proxy setup - OpenSIPS just accepts new packet, for >> example INVITE, changes destination using 'sethostport(....)' and then >> issues 't_relay()' to forward the packet. Let's ignore replies and so on. >> >> If I'm doing a 'fix_nated_contact()' before sending this packet I'm >> expecting Contact: field to be replaced with a source IP:port as per >> manual. And this works if the Contact is in simple form like ' >> sip:[email protected]:65033'. >> >> But if following Contact comes in OpenSIPS doesn't change it leaving >> private IP in the contact: >> >> 'Contact: sip:[email protected]:65033;rinstance=2f59b175103f1088' >> >> Can you please let me know why is that happening? Thanks! >> >> Best regards, >> Yury. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing >> [email protected]http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
