Thank you for the answer! Yes, of cource. But there is this situation:
UAC (INVITE w/o auth) -> OpenSIPS (LB: Ast_1) -> Ast_1 (401 Unauth) UAC (INVITE with auth) -> OpenSIPS (LB: Ast_2) -> Ast_2 (401 Unauth) ... etc, until LB selects the same Asterisk for two INVITE`s (w/o auth and with auth). Vadim > 8 сент. 2022 г., в 12:16, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> > написал(а): > > Hi Vadim, > > If you have a cluster of ASterisk servers, each box from the cluster should > be able to handle the auth response, even if the challenge was done by a > different one. Otherwise it is not a cluster, but a bunch of servers. > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > https://www.opensips-solutions.com > OpenSIPS Summit 27-30 Sept 2022, Athens > https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2022Athens/ > > On 9/7/22 3:52 PM, Vadim Dumalekov via Users wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Please help me. I'm using the Load_Balancer module for the incoming calls to >> an Asterisk cluster. When an INVITE is sent to one of the Asterisks, we >> receive the "401 Unauthorized" message from that server. But when UAC sends >> the INVITE with the authorization, the LB-module sends it to another >> Asterisk. Sometimes it happens multiple times. >> >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> Vadim. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
