Hello! Thanks! But I stayed with the LB-module and CacheDB-local. It works well!
Best regards! > 9 сент. 2022 г., в 15:32, David Villasmil <[email protected]> > написал(а): > > Agreed, just go with dispatcher (I usually do random, which distributes the > calls pretty well) > > On Fri, 9 Sep 2022 at 12:00, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Vadim, > > The 2 INVITE requests are not part of the same dialog, so you cannot use > dlg_val's - each initial INVITE is creating a different dialog. > > Now, if you really want, you can rely on the fact that the 2 INVITEs > have the same call-id and and use the cachedb_local to remember which > Ast box handled the first INVITE. But this somehow will invalidate the > whole idea of balancing calls. > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > https://www.opensips-solutions.com <https://www.opensips-solutions.com/> > OpenSIPS Summit 27-30 Sept 2022, Athens > https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2022Athens/ > <https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2022Athens/> > > On 9/9/22 10:44 AM, Vadim Dumalekov wrote: > > Thanks! > > > > I have one more question. Why can't the dlg_val be set in this case. > > This variable (dlg_val) is not passed to the second INVITE, although it is > > a SIP Dialog (INVITE -> 401 -> ACK -> INVITE ...) > > > > > >> 9 сент. 2022 г., в 9:14, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> написал(а): > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Considering the fact that Ast_2 cannot perform auth on a challenge done by > >> Ast_1, you should re-consider the routing logic in OpenSIPS, and not to > >> use LB, but rather dispatcher with hashing over call-id for example. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > >> > >> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > >> https://www.opensips-solutions.com <https://www.opensips-solutions.com/> > >> OpenSIPS Summit 27-30 Sept 2022, Athens > >> https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2022Athens/ > >> <https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2022Athens/> > >> > >> On 9/8/22 1:43 PM, Vadim Dumalekov via Users wrote: > >>> Thank you for the answer! > >>> > >>> Yes, of cource. But there is this situation: > >>> > >>> UAC (INVITE w/o auth) -> OpenSIPS (LB: Ast_1) -> Ast_1 (401 Unauth) > >>> UAC (INVITE with auth) -> OpenSIPS (LB: Ast_2) -> Ast_2 (401 Unauth) > >>> > >>> ... etc, until LB selects the same Asterisk for two INVITE`s (w/o auth > >>> and with auth). > >>> > >>> > >>> Vadim > >>> > >>>> 8 сент. 2022 г., в 12:16, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected] > >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> написал(а): > >>>> > >>>> Hi Vadim, > >>>> > >>>> If you have a cluster of ASterisk servers, each box from the cluster > >>>> should be able to handle the auth response, even if the challenge was > >>>> done by a different one. Otherwise it is not a cluster, but a bunch of > >>>> servers. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > >>>> > >>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > >>>> https://www.opensips-solutions.com > >>>> <https://www.opensips-solutions.com/> > >>>> OpenSIPS Summit 27-30 Sept 2022, Athens > >>>> https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2022Athens/ > >>>> <https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2022Athens/> > >>>> > >>>> On 9/7/22 3:52 PM, Vadim Dumalekov via Users wrote: > >>>>> Hello! > >>>>> > >>>>> Please help me. I'm using the Load_Balancer module for the incoming > >>>>> calls to an Asterisk cluster. When an INVITE is sent to one of the > >>>>> Asterisks, we receive the "401 Unauthorized" message from that server. > >>>>> But when UAC sends the INVITE with the authorization, the LB-module > >>>>> sends it to another Asterisk. Sometimes it happens multiple times. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks in advance! > >>>>> > >>>>> Vadim. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Users mailing list > >>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >>>>> <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Users mailing list > >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >>>> <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Users mailing list > >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >>> <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users> > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users> > -- > Regards, > > David Villasmil > email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > phone: +34669448337 > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
