On 02/07/2012 10:39, Tiemen Ruiten wrote: > All these messages have been rejected because there are syntax errors in > the SPF-records (you can look them up with a dig-query) > The RFC states the following: > > After one SPF record has been selected, the check_host() function parses > and interprets it to find a result for the current test. If there are > any syntax errors, check_host() returns immediately with the result > "PermError". > > As far as I know there is no option in the webinterface or in the config file > to handle "PermError" any other way than a SPF "Fail" (for example accept and > mark, or plain accept). I'm wondering if there's a way to add this > functionality?
Could you add it as a feature request to http://devlabs.linuxassist.net/projects/policyd/ describing ideas for behaviour on failed SPF checks? _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.policyd.org/mailman/listinfo/users
