On 07/03/2012 11:58 AM, Robert Anderson wrote: > On 02/07/2012 10:39, Tiemen Ruiten wrote: >> All these messages have been rejected because there are syntax errors >> in the SPF-records (you can look them up with a dig-query) The RFC >> states the following: >> >> After one SPF record has been selected, the check_host() function >> parses and interprets it to find a result for the current test. If >> there are any syntax errors, check_host() returns immediately with >> the result "PermError". >> >> As far as I know there is no option in the webinterface or in the >> config file to handle "PermError" any other way than a SPF "Fail" >> (for example accept and mark, or plain accept). I'm wondering if >> there's a way to add this functionality? > > You should be able to get the result you're after using RejectFailedSPF > and AddSPFHeader. If neither exist and / or are zero, the action will be > "none" and processing will continue. >
But the result I'm after is rejecting messages that result in SPF "Fail", and marking messages that result in SPF "PermError". So I'm afraid that won't work. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.policyd.org/mailman/listinfo/users
