On 08/29/2014 03:36 PM, Christopher Hunt wrote:
sorry for the delay, Google marked your message as spam. I find it in
http://www.policyd-weight.org/policyd-weight ,
http://www.policyd-weight.org/policyd-weight-devel , and at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/policyd-weight/files/policyd-weight/
-Chris
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Nigel Kukard <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 08/27/2014 10:14 PM, Christopher Hunt wrote:
I think it may be time for the default RHSBL settings to be updated.
Looking at the latest development version they're still set to:
## RHSBL settings
my @rhsbl_score = (
'multi.surbl.org <http://multi.surbl.org>', 4, 0,
'SURBL',
'rhsbl.ahbl.org <http://rhsbl.ahbl.org>', 4, 0,
'AHBL',
'dsn.rfc-ignorant.org <http://dsn.rfc-ignorant.org>', 3.5,
0, 'DSN_RFCI',
'postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org <http://postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org>',
0.1, 0, 'PM_RFCI',
'abuse.rfc-ignorant.org <http://abuse.rfc-ignorant.org>', 0.1,
0, 'ABUSE_RFCI'
);
RFC-ignorant is gone
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jeff_G./RFC-Ignorant.Org)
abhbl.org <http://abhbl.org> will be gone within several days, if
it isn't already, according to
http://ahbl.org/content/changes-ahbl (when did it become ok to
omit timestamps from blog posts?!)
Which file do you find the above in?
policyd-weight is not policyd, best to use their mailing list
-N
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.policyd.org/mailman/listinfo/users_lists.policyd.org
