Dear Gabriel,
Thanks for your detailed feedback indicating a possible issue with DF1
i'm also concerned about (need to run some tests later).
I hope you can finally eliminate (by-pass) the dE_ads issue.
All the bests,
  t

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 2:51 PM Gabriel Bramley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear Tamas,
>
> I sincerely hope they're using the same basis!
>
> So I've ran a further test with the later DFX type vdW corrections and I 
> notice that these functional yield (expected) overestimated adsorption 
> energies, but within a sensible tolerance. I also notice there are QC tests 
> for DF2 and DF3 type vdW corrections, but no benchmarking for DF1. Given 
> we've eliminated the system, dipole correction, exchange functional and the 
> other vdW type functionals give sensible values, I'm tempted to say there's 
> an issue with the DF1 type correction specifically. I will contact the 
> developers with this issue.
>
> You have been a massive help. Thank you very much for your helpful 
> suggestions.
>
> Kind regards,
> Gabriel Bramley
> ________________________________
> From: users <[email protected]> on behalf of Tamas 
> Karpati <[email protected]>
> Sent: 16 October 2020 13:03
> To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [QE-users] Underestimated Adsorption Energy with optB88-vdW
>
> Dear Gabriel,
>
> Good news. I assume ecutwfc (+ecutrho) and k point
> density are also the same (thus having the same amount of
> systematic offset). I guess the deviation is from another
> source. One more thing I can think of is the basis being used.
> Is it possible for you to use the exact same PW basis in
> each software? I hope so. If not, I have no idea -except for an
> implementation difference...
>
> I rechecked the corresponding source and found (also referred
> to by INPUT_PW.html @ input_dft) it to be Modules/funct.f90.
> I do not know how it relates to the LIBXC+QE combo, guess
> it's just the QE internal machinery -with a useful list of
> functionals and numbering in the lengthy comments.
> I hope it helps but I cannot contribute more to this.
>
> Good luck,
>   t
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:32 AM Gabriel Bramley
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Thomas,
> >
> > Apologies for the lack of clarity. Yes, they are.
> > I have checked this and they appear correct. I believe the numbers 
> > represent (exchange, correlation, gradient corrected exchange, gradient 
> > corrected correlation, meta GGA and vdW (non-local correlation) 
> > correction). obk8 is specified as (slater, Perdew Wang, optB88x, p86c, no 
> > meta GGA, no vdW correction) and vdwdf-obk8 is specified as (slater, Perdew 
> > Wang, optB88x, no gradient corrected correlation, no meta GGA, DF-vdW1), 
> > which looks correct to me, as the E_xc term in the original optB88-vdW 
> > paper consists of E_xc = E^GGA_x + E^LDA_c + E^nl(vdW)_c. However, there 
> > might be some nuance I am missing. Further, I've had a look in the code 
> > itself (xc_df_vdW) and how it relates to the core PW-SCF and nothing jumps 
> > out as being out of the ordinary, but I'm not familiar enough with the QE 
> > code to make a complete judgement on that.
> >
> >             I've run further calculations with the LIBXC library (using 
> > their version of optb88 exchange), and that doesn't yield improvement 
> > either.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Gabriel Bramley
> > ________________________________
> > From: users <[email protected]> on behalf of Tamas 
> > Karpati <[email protected]>
> > Sent: 12 October 2020 12:53
> > To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [QE-users] Underestimated Adsorption Energy with optB88-vdW
> >
> > Dear Gabriel,
> > 1, The same box size everywhere, or not?
> > 2, QE reports near the beginning of its output a series of 6 or 7 numbers,
> >     each indicating a term in the functional. Cannot now recall which
> >     but -if you cannot find- I can check in a week the source file that
> >     actually lists them (just easy comments, no code).
> >     Also, if a dispersion term is applied pw.x reports it somewhat below
> >     (in connection with the vdw_corr input parameter).
> >     I hope it helps to identify what theory you are actually using.
> >     (Note: input_dft overwrites the functional specification of the UPF file
> >     but vdW terms are just additive, not exclusive -if i'm correct).
> > HTH.
> >   t
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 3:28 PM Gabriel Bramley <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Thomas,
> > >
> > > Yes, the box size should be converged for the dipole corrections 
> > > specified (over twice the length in the z-direction of the initial system 
> > > itself). I've just ran a few tests using an incredibly large box size (50 
> > > Ang) and the enthalpy value remains similarly low compared to literature 
> > > values.
> > >
> > > I'm thinking your second suggestion is quite likely. The calculation does 
> > > output a non-local correlation energy in the high verbosity mode, but 
> > > perhaps the relevant terms aren't being added correctly in the final 
> > > total energy. I will report back once I've looked into this more 
> > > thoroughly.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your input
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Gabriel
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: users <[email protected]> on behalf of Tamas 
> > > Karpati <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: 08 October 2020 07:51
> > > To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Re: [QE-users] Underestimated Adsorption Energy with optB88-vdW
> > >
> > > Dear Gabriel,
> > > By "consistent box" sizes do you mean that you have
> > > converged the box sizes for all three species?
> > > I rather meant the exact same box size for all
> > > (and this size be converged, ie. large enough for each).
> > >
> > > BTW, the systematic differences you observed might be
> > > due to a vdW (or another) term switched on/off
> > > (or a bug/error in code/functional).
> > > Make sure, everything is treated appropriately.
> > > For instance, input_dft can be trickier than you expect 1st.
> > > Doubly disperse the functional (in both input_dft and
> > > vdw_corr) might do sg. similar.
> > > Bests,
> > >   t
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:17 PM Gabriel Bramley <[email protected]> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello Thomas,
> > > >
> > > > 1/2
> > > >
> > > > They haven't specified any parameters to my knowledge that would lead 
> > > > to such a large error. There may be slight difference in the thresholds 
> > > > of energetic convergence, but they should yield errors on a much 
> > > > smaller scale.
> > > >
> > > > 2/2
> > > >
> > > > RE: box sizes - We did briefly fall foul of having inconsistent box 
> > > > sizes for one or two calculations, but this is definitely a problem 
> > > > we've addressed. (We use slightly different box sizes for the 
> > > > adsorbate, but I've ran a few different cell sizes for this small 
> > > > molecules and it yielded very small differences).
> > > >
> > > > And you're quite right, I do apologise, that should be written as:
> > > > E_adsorption = E_(slab+adsorbate) - (E_slab + E_adsorbate)
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Gabriel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: users <[email protected]> on behalf of 
> > > > Tamas Karpati <[email protected]>
> > > > Sent: 07 October 2020 11:57
> > > > To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum <[email protected]>
> > > > Subject: Re: [QE-users] Underestimated Adsorption Energy with optB88-vdW
> > > >
> > > > Dear Gabriel,
> > > >
> > > > 1/2, are your sims. reproducing *all* of the ref. params? (eg. are
> > > > cell parameters the same?)
> > > >       any missing params. would contribute by adding an *unknown*
> > > > magnitude of error...
> > > > 2/2, my guess would be that your evaluation of dE_a is wrong due to
> > > > *different cell sizes*
> > > >       (basis set superposition error?); this would explain the
> > > > systematic character of the deviation
> > > >       and suggest (pain indeed) to increase cell sizes up to the same
> > > > (ie. the largest) of
> > > >       E_slab+ads, E_slab and E_adsorbant.
> > > > +1, your eq. for the heat is recursive (kidding): LHS is to be renamed!
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > >   t
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:19 PM Gabriel Bramley 
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Users,
> > > > >
> > > > > Problem:
> > > > >
> > > > > I am performing calculations with the optB88-vdW functional to obtain 
> > > > > adsorption energies of small aromatic molecules on metallic surface 
> > > > > facets (Pt(111) and phenol for the cases discussed here). 
> > > > > Unfortunately, the adsorption energies obtained from these 
> > > > > calculations are systematically 50 kJ mol^-1 below comparable studies 
> > > > > performed with VASP. I have replicated their parameters as closely as 
> > > > > possible - as such I am also using PBE PAW pseudopotentials from the 
> > > > > psl pseudopotential library.
> > > > >
> > > > > The above underestimation occurs for a fully periodic calculation. 
> > > > > Using the dipole corrections (2D and ESM (bc1)) appears to exacerbate 
> > > > > these issues, leading to a 70 kJ mol^-1 underestimation of the 
> > > > > adsorption energy. (The system is centred in the centre of the cell 
> > > > > with 8 Ang of vacuum either side of the system for 2D, and the system 
> > > > > is centred around z=0 for ESM).
> > > > >
> > > > > The calculation for adsorption energy is performed as:
> > > > > E_ads = E_slab+ads - (E_slab + E_ads)
> > > > > Where the adsorbate is calculated in a 30x30x30 Ang cell with the 
> > > > > Markov-Payne dipole correction (Though this give negligable 
> > > > > difference compared to full PBC).
> > > > >
> > > > > Question:
> > > > >
> > > > > The PBE+rvv10 functional performs significantly better with PBC and 
> > > > > 2D Coulomb Cutoff, giving sensible and expected values for the 
> > > > > adsorption energy. However, I am cautious in trusting these results 
> > > > > given the large errors for the optB88-vdW functional. Is there 
> > > > > something obvious I am missing in these calculations or is this a 
> > > > > known issue?
> > > > >
> > > > > A previous email to this list has pointed out other issues with this 
> > > > > functional 
> > > > > (https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mail-archive.com%2Fusers%40lists.quantum-espresso.org%2Fmsg35965.html&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788255700%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=D4Lv5C%2FNV8PfrvO2XKFwAHcBpzpmbqxv0c6RTQaW%2FOM%3D&amp;reserved=0).
> > > > >  This might help, but could someone please clarify this as well?
> > > > >
> > > > > Additional information:
> > > > >
> > > > > I am using QE v.6.5 compiled with Intel-2018 with the ELPA 2017 
> > > > > library. Enivron Module installed but not used in these calculations. 
> > > > > All QC tests pass without error.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please find below the input file:
> > > > >
> > > > > ___________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > &CONTROL
> > > > >    calculation      = 'relax'
> > > > >    restart_mode     = 'from_scratch'
> > > > >    prefix           = 'Pt'
> > > > >    disk_io          = 'low'
> > > > >    pseudo_dir       = '/home/gab1u17/pslib-kj-paw/'
> > > > >    nstep            = 300
> > > > > /
> > > > > &SYSTEM
> > > > >    ibrav            = 0
> > > > >    ecutwfc          = 45
> > > > >    ecutrho          = 360
> > > > >    occupations      = 'smearing'
> > > > >    degauss          = 0.05
> > > > >    smearing         = 'gaussian'
> > > > >    input_dft        = 'vdw-df-obk8'
> > > > >    assume_isolated  = '2D'
> > > > >    ntyp             = 4
> > > > >    nat              = 48
> > > > > /
> > > > > &ELECTRONS
> > > > >    electron_maxstep = 150
> > > > >    conv_thr         = 8e-08
> > > > >    mixing_mode      = 'local-TF'
> > > > >    mixing_beta      = 0.2
> > > > > /
> > > > > &IONS
> > > > >    ion_dynamics     = 'bfgs'
> > > > > /
> > > > > &CELL
> > > > > /
> > > > >
> > > > > ATOMIC_SPECIES
> > > > > Pt 195.084 Pt.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
> > > > > C 12.011 C.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
> > > > > O 15.999 O.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
> > > > > H 1.008 H.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
> > > > >
> > > > > K_POINTS automatic
> > > > > 6 6 1  0 0 0
> > > > >
> > > > > CELL_PARAMETERS angstrom
> > > > > 7.42718991274627 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000
> > > > > 3.71359495637314 6.43213514316980 0.00000000000000
> > > > > 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 29.000000000003126
> > > > >
> > > > > ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
> > > > > Pt 2.5641489000 0.4594382200 8.0000000000  0 0 0
> > > > > Pt 5.2167167200 1.3783146700 8.0000000000  0 0 0
> > > > > ...
> > > > > Pt 4.1556895900 0.1531460700 17.1683222700
> > > > > Pt 6.8082574200 1.0720225200 17.1683222700
> > > > > Pt 2.0336353300 1.9908989700 17.1683222700
> > > > > ...
> > > > > H 0.3060672802 1.6388023741 19.1376040000
> > > > > H 2.7167357186 1.0284278006 19.1376040000
> > > > > H 4.4562891110 2.8078620154 19.1376040000
> > > > >
> > > > > ___________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you in advance for your assistance.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > Gabriel Bramley
> > > > > PhD. Candidate
> > > > > University of Southampton
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX 
> > > > > (https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.max-centre.eu%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788265666%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=ddFlndxLXahSk6mZG0V%2Fu%2F2a5emDIv5X4165hpP1hEE%3D&amp;reserved=0)
> > > > > users mailing list [email protected]
> > > > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.quantum-espresso.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusers&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788265666%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=RT%2FcUbhzv5ogqUKeX%2F7FlJipg0ti5hHi3phtG27Twms%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX 
> > > > (https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.max-centre.eu%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788265666%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=ddFlndxLXahSk6mZG0V%2Fu%2F2a5emDIv5X4165hpP1hEE%3D&amp;reserved=0)
> > > > users mailing list [email protected]
> > > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.quantum-espresso.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusers&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788265666%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=RT%2FcUbhzv5ogqUKeX%2F7FlJipg0ti5hHi3phtG27Twms%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX 
> > > > (https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.max-centre.eu%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788265666%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=ddFlndxLXahSk6mZG0V%2Fu%2F2a5emDIv5X4165hpP1hEE%3D&amp;reserved=0)
> > > > users mailing list [email protected]
> > > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.quantum-espresso.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusers&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788265666%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=RT%2FcUbhzv5ogqUKeX%2F7FlJipg0ti5hHi3phtG27Twms%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX 
> > > (https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.max-centre.eu%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788265666%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=ddFlndxLXahSk6mZG0V%2Fu%2F2a5emDIv5X4165hpP1hEE%3D&amp;reserved=0)
> > > users mailing list [email protected]
> > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.quantum-espresso.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusers&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788265666%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=RT%2FcUbhzv5ogqUKeX%2F7FlJipg0ti5hHi3phtG27Twms%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX 
> > > (https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.max-centre.eu%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788265666%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=ddFlndxLXahSk6mZG0V%2Fu%2F2a5emDIv5X4165hpP1hEE%3D&amp;reserved=0)
> > > users mailing list [email protected]
> > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.quantum-espresso.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusers&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788275617%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=m53YxLFdsDpijbN0egyhiw4DM3tmykH0v3Vt%2BaAE1kg%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > _______________________________________________
> > Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX 
> > (https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.max-centre.eu%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788275617%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=HaHXUsuxiDIycmyuWryKaKuhAtrgCel%2BumH11wXiiug%3D&amp;reserved=0)
> > users mailing list [email protected]
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.quantum-espresso.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusers&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788275617%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=m53YxLFdsDpijbN0egyhiw4DM3tmykH0v3Vt%2BaAE1kg%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > _______________________________________________
> > Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX 
> > (https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.max-centre.eu%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788275617%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=HaHXUsuxiDIycmyuWryKaKuhAtrgCel%2BumH11wXiiug%3D&amp;reserved=0)
> > users mailing list [email protected]
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.quantum-espresso.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusers&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788275617%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=m53YxLFdsDpijbN0egyhiw4DM3tmykH0v3Vt%2BaAE1kg%3D&amp;reserved=0
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX 
> (https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.max-centre.eu%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788275617%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=HaHXUsuxiDIycmyuWryKaKuhAtrgCel%2BumH11wXiiug%3D&amp;reserved=0)
> users mailing list [email protected]
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.quantum-espresso.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusers&amp;data=04%7C01%7CG.A.Bramley%40soton.ac.uk%7Cc2f931b9b5174bb4aede08d871cb2f3f%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0%7C0%7C637384464788275617%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=m53YxLFdsDpijbN0egyhiw4DM3tmykH0v3Vt%2BaAE1kg%3D&amp;reserved=0
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
> users mailing list [email protected]
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to