Dear,

Thank you for your explanation. 
I'll try both occupancies to see if the results of bandgap and DOS are very 
different. When I got the values, I can post the differences here.

I would like to ask if you could tell me why this question generates so 
different answers. As just like in the tutorials I saw, each one gave me a 
different answer.

Best wishes,
José Xavier


Em terça-feira, 2 de novembro de 2021 00:41:19 BRT, Mahmoud Payami Shabestari 
<[email protected]> escreveu: 






Dear Xavier,

 

> So, I can use the Fixed occupation and, if the energy levels show a small 
> bandgap, I introduce the >Smearing. Is it right?

 

Yes, exactly.


 

>If yes, I just have to add the nbnd function in the input file?

 

Yes. It suffices to put nbnd equal to N/2 + 1 (N is number of electrons).

 

Mahmoud

> From: xavier neto via users <[email protected]>
> 
> To: Mahmoud Payami Shabestari <[email protected]>, Quantum ESPRESSO users 
> Forum <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 21:04:31 -0300
> Subject: [QE-users] occupation in biological molecules and band gap
>   
> Dear Mahmoud Payami,
> 
> Thank you for your answer. It helps me a lot.
> 
> So, I can use the Fixed occupation and, if the energy levels show a small 
> bandgap, I introduce the Smearing. Is it right?
> 
>  
> 
> About the second question. I've read that the result of HOMO - LUMO, obtained 
> after the SCF calculation, can give the bandgap. Can I obtain the bandgap in 
> that way? If yes, I just have to add the nbnd function in the input file?
> 
> On 11/1/21 02:04, Mahmoud Payami Shabestari wrote:
> 
>>  
>> Dear José Xavier,
>> 
>> Hi.
>> 
>> Smearing for the occupations is used when the levels near HOMO are so close 
>> (commonly in metals near Fermi level) that in consecutive iterations they 
>> may exchange positions and lead to nonconvergence. For semiconductors with 
>> 3-5 eV gap I think it won't help. 
>> 
>> Bests
>> 
>>  
>> Mahmoud Payami
>> 
>> NSTRI, AEOI, Tehran, Iran
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>>   
>>> From: José Xavier via users <[email protected]>
>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 00:18:55 +0000 (UTC)
>>> Subject: [QE-users] occupation in biological molecules and band gap
>>>   
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> I'm new in QE. The group that I'm working with usually calculates the 
>>> properties of biologically relevant molecules, like amino acids, hormones, 
>>> neurotransmitters, and drugs, and I would like to introduce the QE code to 
>>> the group. Their previous papers have shown that the bandgap of these 
>>> crystals is something between 3-5 eV, which I understand to be in the 
>>> semiconductor range.
>>> 
>>> I've watched/read some tutorials about QE, and some of these showed that 
>>> the occupation of semiconductors should be "smearing", other ones that it 
>>> should be "fixed", but no one showed calculations with this kind of 
>>> molecules. What value should I use for the SCF and electronic calculations 
>>> of the crystals that I'm going to work on (amino acids, hormones, 
>>> neurotransmitters, and drugs)?
>>> 
>>> *Are there any differences when the molecule has a metal, like the Heme 
>>> group?
>>> 
>>> Besides, I would like to ask if there is a calculation that I could perform 
>>> to obtain the bandgap of these molecules. Is it only possible if I create 
>>> the band structure figure and calculate the difference between the peaks in 
>>> VB and CB?
>>> 
>>> Thank you for your help,
>>> 
>>> Sincerely,
>>> José Xavier
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
>>> users mailing list [email protected]
>>> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to