Hi all,
Thank you very much for your support. I think I am getting pretty close to
finishing my deployment.
My status now is:
'openstack stack resource list overcloud' displays all resources in
CREATE_COMPLETE state, with the exception of AllNodesDeploySteps which is in
CREATE_FAILED state.
resource_status_reason is Error:
resources.AllNodesDeploySteps.resources.ControllerDeployment_Step5.resources[0]:
Deployment to server failed: deploy_status_code: Deployment exited with
non-zero status code: 6
From the json which has status_code 6 in /var/lib/heat-config/deployed on
Controller node, I have:
deploy_stdout: Dependency Service[aodh-api] has failures:
true\u001b[0m\n\u001b[mNotice:
/Stage[main]/Keystone::Deps/Anchor[keystone::service::end]: Dependency
Service[ceilometer-api] has failures: true\u001b[0m\n\u001b[mNotice:
/Stage[main]/Keystone::Deps/Anchor[keystone::service::end]: Dependency
Service[gnocchi-api] has failures: true\u001b[0m\n\u001b[mNotice:
/Stage[main]/Keystone::Deps/Anchor[keystone::service::end]: Dependency
Service[aodh-api] has failures: true\u001b[0m\n\u001b[mNotice:
/Stage[main]/Neutron::Keystone::Auth/Keystone::Resource::Service_identity[neutron]/Keystone_user[neutron]:
Dependency Service[ceilometer-api] has failures:
true\u001b[0m\n\u001b[mNotice:
/Stage[main]/Neutron::Keystone::Auth/Keystone::Resource::Service_identity[neutron]/Keystone_user[neutron]:
Dependency Service[gnocchi-api] has failures: true\u001b[0m\n\u001b[mNotice:
/Stage[main]/Neutron::Keystone::Auth/Keystone::Resource::Service_identity[neutron]/Keystone_user[neutron]:
deploy_stderr: Could not look up qualified variable '::nova::api::admin_user';
class ::nova::api has not been evaluated\u001b[0m\n\u001b[1;31mWarning:
Scope(Class[Nova::Keystone::Authtoken]): Could not look up qualified variable
'::nova::api::admin_password'; class ::nova::api has not been
evaluated\u001b[0m\n\u001b[1;31mWarning:
Scope(Class[Nova::Keystone::Authtoken]): Could not look up qualified variable
'::nova::api::admin_tenant_name'; class ::nova::api has not been
evaluated\u001b[0m\n\u001b[1;31mWarning:
Scope(Class[Nova::Keystone::Authtoken]): Could not look up qualified variable
'::nova::api::auth_uri'; class ::nova::api has not been
evaluated\u001b[0m\n\u001b[1;31mWarning:
Scope(Class[Nova::Keystone::Authtoken]): Could not look up qualified variable
'::nova::api::auth_version'; class ::nova::api has not been
evaluated\u001b[0m\n\u001b[1;31mWarning:
Scope(Class[Nova::Keystone::Authtoken]): Could not look up qualified variable
'::nova::api::identity_uri'; class ::nova::api has not been evaluated
I've estimated that my deployment failed after half an hour, not after 4 hours
like it did before.
I think my deployment failed because I haven't defined yet InternalApiNetCidr
and TenantNetCidr.
Next step will be to define these in in network-environment.yaml.
I will use static IP addresses for both InternalApiNetCidr and TenantNetCidr
and I will add these static IP addresses in ips_from_pool_all.yaml.
I will also define ../network/ports/internal_api_from_pool.yaml and
../network/ports/tenant_from_pool.yaml.
Please let me know whether you have other ideas why my deployment fails.
To get here, I have added the following lines in both controller.yaml and
compute.yaml:
routes:
-
ip_netmask: 169.254.169.254/32
next_hop: {get_param: EC2MetadataIp}
-
and the lines:
-
type: interface
name: eth1
use_dhcp: false # This effectively disables NIC1
-
type: interface
name: eth2
use_dhcp: false # This effectively disables NIC2
On both the controller and the compute overcloud VMs, I have the following
routing table:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway
Genmask
Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
0.0.0.0 <External Interface Gateway
IP> 0.0.0.0 UG 0
0 0 br-ex
<External CIDR> 0.0.0.0
255.255.255.128 U
0 0 0 br-ex
<Provision CIDR> 0.0.0.0
255.255.255.0 U
0 0 0 eth3
169.254.169.254 <Undercloud Provision IP>
255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0
0 eth3
Thanks,
Anda
From: Pedro Sousa [mailto:pgso...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 1:22 PM
To: Anda Nicolae
Cc: ra...@redhat.com; users@lists.rdoproject.org
Subject: Re: [rdo-users] RHOSP 10 failed overcloud deployment
Hi Anda,
all the issues seem to related, if you're using tunneled networks you need to
configure tenant networks on both controller and computes.
Also if you're using static ips you should have internal networks defined and
bind them on ServiceNetMap.
In the compute nodes if you don't use external network make sure you have the
default route and 169.254.169.254/32<http://169.254.169.254/32> on ctlplane
network, something like this:
network_config:
-
type: interface
name: nic1
use_dhcp: false
dns_servers: {get_param: DnsServers}
addresses:
-
ip_netmask:
list_join:
- '/'
- - {get_param: ControlPlaneIp}
- {get_param: ControlPlaneSubnetCidr}
routes:
-
ip_netmask: 169.254.169.254/32<http://169.254.169.254/32>
next_hop: {get_param: EC2MetadataIp}
-
default: true
next_hop: {get_param: ControlPlaneDefaultRoute}
Hope it helps.
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Anda Nicolae
<anico...@lenovo.com<mailto:anico...@lenovo.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for the info about the 2 networks (external and ctlplane) that I need on
the overcloud VMs (controller and compute).
Now br-ex on my overcloud VMs has the external IP address and I am able to ping
overcloud VMs on both external and ctlplane IP addresses.
Also, since for the external network I use static IPs, in my
ips-from-pool-all.yaml, I have:
OS::TripleO::Compute::Ports::ExternalPort:
../network/ports/external_from_pool_compute.yaml
external_from_pool_compute.yaml is similar to external_from_pool.yaml file.
I've noticed that I if use noop.yaml, the external IP is not assigned to eth0
interface on the compute node.
I hope it is correct to use it like this.
I have continued with my overcloud deployment and I've noticed that some
progress has been made:
- Controller resource is now in CREATE_COMPLETE state
- although deployment still fails, I can connect to the overcloud VMs via both
ctlplane IP and external IP and check the logs, after the failure of the deploy
operation
Compute resource fails with the CREATE aborted reason. I've looked in
/valog/messages on the overcloud compute VM and I've noticed the following
error messages that keep repeating:
Feb 2 03:09:36 localhost os-collect-config: Source [ec2] Unavailable.
Feb 2 03:09:36 localhost os-collect-config:
/var/lib/os-collect-config/local-data not found. Skipping
Feb 2 03:09:36 localhost os-collect-config: No local metadata found
(['/var/lib/os-collect-config/local-data'])
Feb 2 03:10:16 localhost os-collect-config:
HTTPConnectionPool(host='169.254.169.254', port=80): Max retries exceeded with
url: /latest/meta-data/ (Caused by
ConnectTimeoutError(<requests.packages.urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object
at 0x2752190>, 'Connection to 169.254.169.254 timed out. (connect
timeout=10.0)'))
From heat-engine.log, I have:
2018-02-01 19:26:32.253 3348 DEBUG neutronclient.v2_0.client
[req-c27f050c-b743-4e1d-a706-e01e63a43b49 fdfcf2f659a94e57829dbefc618f3d3b
453c1e37b83f4f8e8a49dab299e8224d - - -] Error message: {"NeutronError":
{"message": "Port 0292b718-2c28-4b0c-a517-c481c547b711 could not be found.",
"type": "PortNotFound", "detail": ""}} _handle_fault_response
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/neutronclient/v2_0/client.py:266
I have 2 questions regarding the deployment:
1. Does any of the error messages above cause the failed deployment of the
Compute resource?
2. In my network-environment.yaml, I haven't set InternalApiNetCidr,
TenantNetCidr, InternalApiNetworkVlanID, TenantNetworkVlanID.
Do I need to set these in order to make de overcloud deployment work?
Thanks,
Anda
From: Anda Nicolae
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 12:40 PM
To: 'Pedro Sousa'
Cc: ra...@redhat.com<mailto:ra...@redhat.com>;
users@lists.rdoproject.org<mailto:users@lists.rdoproject.org>
Subject: RE: [rdo-users] RHOSP 10 failed overcloud deployment
I've just run 'neutron net-list' on the undercloud node and I have the 2
networks, ctlplane and external.
My belief was that I don't need the external network, I only need the provision
(ctlplane) network for the deployment.
I don't have a DHCP server for my external network.
Do I need to set the external IP address for the compute node and for the
controller node in the yaml files from templates folder?
Thanks,
Anda
From: Pedro Sousa [mailto:pgso...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 12:32 PM
To: Anda Nicolae
Cc: ra...@redhat.com<mailto:ra...@redhat.com>;
users@lists.rdoproject.org<mailto:users@lists.rdoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [rdo-users] RHOSP 10 failed overcloud deployment
Hi Anda,
some things you could check:
Do you have 2 networks on director (ctlplane and external) and are they
reachable from the overcloud nodes?
Seems to me that you have network issues and that's because you're seeing those
long timeouts.
For "Message: No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available"
message you could check "/var/log/nova/nova-conductor.log".
Regards
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Anda Nicolae
<anico...@lenovo.com<mailto:anico...@lenovo.com>> wrote:
I've let the deployment run overnight and it failed after almost 4hrs with the
errors below. Do you happen to know the config file where I can decrease the
timeout? I looked in /etc/nova/nova.conf and in ironic config files but I
couldn't find anything relevant.
The errors are:
[overcloud.Compute.0]: CREATE_FAILED ResourceInError:
resources[0].resources.NovaCompute: Went to status ERROR due to "Message:
Unknown, Code: Unknown"
[overcloud.Controller.0]: CREATE_FAILED Resource CREATE failed:
ResourceInError: resources.Controller: Went to status ERROR due to "Message: No
valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available., Code: 500"
It is unclear to me why the above errors occur, since in my instackenv.json I
declared node capabilities for both the computer and the controller node to be
greater than the compute and controller flavors from 'openstack flavor list'.
However, I've found this link and I am looking over it:
https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/admin/troubleshooting.html#nova-returns-no-valid-host-was-found-error
Thanks,
Anda
-----Original Message-----
From: Raoul Scarazzini [mailto:ra...@redhat.com<mailto:ra...@redhat.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 8:17 PM
To: Anda Nicolae; users@lists.rdoproject.org<mailto:users@lists.rdoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [rdo-users] RHOSP 10 failed overcloud deployment
On 01/30/2018 04:39 PM, Anda Nicolae wrote:
> Got it.
>
> I've noticed that it spends quite some time in CREATE_IN_PROGRESS state for
> OS::Heat::ResourceGroup resource (on Controller node).
> Overcloud deployment fails after 4h. I will check in which config file is the
> overcloud deployment timeout configured and decrease it.
>
> Thanks,
> Anda
Check also network settings. 4h timeout is the default when something is
unreachable.
--
Raoul Scarazzini
ra...@redhat.com<mailto:ra...@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.rdoproject.org<mailto:users@lists.rdoproject.org>
http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
To unsubscribe:
users-unsubscr...@lists.rdoproject.org<mailto:users-unsubscr...@lists.rdoproject.org>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.rdoproject.org
http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
To unsubscribe: users-unsubscr...@lists.rdoproject.org
