On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Gordan Bobic wrote: > On a somewhat tangentially related note, do you really > need to use spamassassin? I find I solved most of my > spam problems by:
> 1) Nolisting > Downside - you need multiple IPs. ehh? just assign an A record for the closest handy RFC 1918. Perfectly legal, and indeed sensible and functional if the next more distant actually CAN reach the closest, such as by it being a backside network interface. Hard to get much closer than that As I think it through, one could even ** alias ** an RFC 1918 IP on top of the interface of the next more distant outside interface if there is not a backside, and kill two birds with one rock (the seeming second closest 'knows' it is also the at the IP of final destination unit) It 'should' know that, but adding that A record to the list of hostnames for which that unit knows it receives, may be needed ... testing -- Russ herrold _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users
