On 02/27/2015 02:31 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: > On 2015-02-26 21:30, Jacco Ligthart wrote: >> On 02/26/2015 01:03 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the detailed analysis. >>> Would it be worth rebuilding pixman with 4.4.5 to see if that makes >>> the problem not manifest? That is not to say it's a fix if it works >>> - it >>> could just be masking the issue, but at least it gives a narrower >>> starting point for bisection. >> >> Just tested, gcc 4.4.5 does not produce a working pixman > > Hmm... Off the wall idea, but if you rebuild the old, known > working version of pixman on a fully up to date build box, > does that pixman then work? Or does that end up being broken > as well?
Hmm, to add to the confusion, this creates an working pixman. I noticed that RSEL6 builds with different CFLAGS than RSEL7, probably that's the next thing to test. RSEL6: CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -march=armv5te' RSEL7: CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -march=armv5te -mfloat-abi=soft' Jacco _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users
