On 02/27/2015 02:31 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: > On 2015-02-26 21:30, Jacco Ligthart wrote: >> On 02/26/2015 01:03 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the detailed analysis. >>> Would it be worth rebuilding pixman with 4.4.5 to see if that makes >>> the problem not manifest? That is not to say it's a fix if it works >>> - it >>> could just be masking the issue, but at least it gives a narrower >>> starting point for bisection. >> >> Just tested, gcc 4.4.5 does not produce a working pixman > > Hmm... Off the wall idea, but if you rebuild the old, known > working version of pixman on a fully up to date build box, > does that pixman then work? Or does that end up being broken > as well? > > I'll try to do some more investigation on my side this weekend, > once I have my chromebook working again. >
OK, new workaround :) if you add "--disable-arm-simd --disable-arm-neon" to the configure flags you'll end with a working version. But then, I still do not understand why building without these flags on EL7 results in a working pixman ??? Jacco _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users
