On 2015-07-05 21:54, Jacco Ligthart wrote:
the 'branding' part was meant for items which had branding issues.
IIRC this should now hold 4 different cases of <vendor>.pool.ntp.org
(ntp, chrony, ipa and system-config-date), indexhtml and probably
some
items where I debranded the update and did not bother with the base
RPM (firefox comes to mind).
To me it looks a bit strange that we have now some redsleeve-* RPMS
in
there.
It's what came rsynced down from your repository.
uhm, no :)
I guess they came from here:
http://ftp.redsleeve.org/pub/el7-devel/el7-branding/
which is outside of my tree.
Oh, _those_! :)
Isn't branding the right place for those?
It would be my choice to put redsleeve-* items in extras
redsleeve-release is in branding, which seems reasonable to me.
Or am I missing something here?
In the end I don't care much, as long as all RPMs are there.
It's just that I think of 'extra' as "stuff that we added', which of
course should include redsleeve-* things. (it also does have
redsleeve-bookmarks and redsleeve-logos)
Hmm... It's technically not _new_ packages, it's replacements
for the centos-* packages.
On the other hand my interpretation of 'branding' is/was 'things still
to debrand' or 'folder that should be empty by the time of GA'
Oh... I thought it was stuff that has already been rebranded...
Where does that leave us? Are there some packages that I need
to remove?
Gordan
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users
