Excellent, Gordan! I should have an announcement online tomorrow. --( Sent via Android )-- On Jul 5, 2015 5:55 PM, "Jacco Ligthart" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05-07-15 23:13, Gordan Bobic wrote: > > On 2015-07-05 21:54, Jacco Ligthart wrote: > >>>> > >>>> the 'branding' part was meant for items which had branding issues. > >>>> IIRC this should now hold 4 different cases of <vendor>.pool.ntp.org > >>>> (ntp, chrony, ipa and system-config-date), indexhtml and probably some > >>>> items where I debranded the update and did not bother with the base > >>>> RPM (firefox comes to mind). > >>>> To me it looks a bit strange that we have now some redsleeve-* RPMS in > >>>> there. > >>> > >>> It's what came rsynced down from your repository. > >> > >> uhm, no :) > >> I guess they came from here: > >> http://ftp.redsleeve.org/pub/el7-devel/el7-branding/ > >> which is outside of my tree. > > > > Oh, _those_! :) > > Isn't branding the right place for those? > > > >>>> It would be my choice to put redsleeve-* items in extras > >>> > >>> redsleeve-release is in branding, which seems reasonable to me. > >>> Or am I missing something here? > >> > >> In the end I don't care much, as long as all RPMs are there. > >> It's just that I think of 'extra' as "stuff that we added', which of > >> course should include redsleeve-* things. (it also does have > >> redsleeve-bookmarks and redsleeve-logos) > > > > Hmm... It's technically not _new_ packages, it's replacements > > for the centos-* packages. > > Could also be, but then they belong in 'changed'. > > > > >> On the other hand my interpretation of 'branding' is/was 'things still > >> to debrand' or 'folder that should be empty by the time of GA' > > > > Oh... I thought it was stuff that has already been rebranded... > nope, the rebranded stuff all went into changed. I did not make a > distinction there between 'changes due to other arch' and 'changes due > to branding'. > > > Where does that leave us? Are there some packages that I need > > to remove? > > > Don't think so. > besides the 2 redsleeve-* items, there are now RPMs from 6 SRPMs. > 4 of which are the ntp issue, where we decided that we would wait for > the pool.ntp.org guys. (assuming that centos people don't mind that we > use their pool) > 1 is firefox, which has a rebranded version in updates. this one could > be removed or we could put the update here. I don't think anyone cares > because this is effectively not going to be installed anywhere. > the last 1 is centos-indexhtml. This one should have been rebranded > IMHO. but at this time I don't think we can take it out. it would break > firefox and lynx. > > Jacco > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users
