On 11/18/15 11:04, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> On 2015-11-17 20:57, Silvio Wanka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got this auto-reply. The most open source projects have at least one
>> open mailing list for user questions. But your project has only one
>> and which is closed. :-(
>
> I cannot say I have ever seen an open source project mailing list
> (or any other mailing list in the recent years, for that matter)
> that allows posts from non-subscribers, purely due to spam volumes
> that this results in.
>
> My view is that anybody who cares enough about an answer to their
> question should also care enough to spend 30 seconds subscribing,
> before they ask the question, and another 30 seconds unsubscribing
> once they have gotten their answer. If they don't care enough to
> do that, I don't see why anybody should care enough to spend
> what is likely to be much longer than that answering their question.
>
> I have included the list with this reply, but unless the responders
> hit reply-to-all you won't see their responses except by looking
> at the list archives.
>
>> I have a pre-usage question and IMO makes it no sense to be subscribed
>> as long I don’t use RedSleeve it . So how can I get an answer on my
>> question below?
>
> Most questions in the world of ARM Linux distributions of today are
> pre-usage, usually related to requesting help with getting things
> running on a system that doesn't have a pre-generated image already
> (and given the number of ARM boards out there, images will never
> be available pre-generated for more than a handful of the most popular
> devices).
>
>>> I have checked the repositories and find ipa-client and
>>> ipa-admin-tools, but there is ipa-server? The Raspberry Pi would be
>>> a good choice for a replica server in my environment but RedSleeve
>>> 7.1 is the only distribution which includes a to CentOS 7.1
>>> compatible version but only the client. Fedora 20 contains only
>>> FreeIPA 3.x and Fedora > 20 supports only Raspberry PI 2. CentOS
>>> offers also only an ARMv7 image and this is pre-alpha. So RedSleeve
>>> would be the right choice if it would include the server part :-(.
>>>
>>> Any plan to add the server part? IMO is any server function a
>>> must-have for an enterprise system ;-).
>
> The primary reason it isn't included is this snippet from the
> source package .spec file:
>
> %ifarch x86_64 %{ix86}
> # Nothing, we want to force just building client on non-Intel
> %else
> %global ONLY_CLIENT 1
> %endif
>
> This comes from the upstream package. I don't know whether the
> build of the server component has been attempted on the non-x86
> platforms.
>
> Jacco, have you tried it?No, as I personally don't use IPA, I was happy when the SRPM build, and the result installed without errors. I never noticed that we only got the client this way. > > If not, Silvio, can you please raise a ticket on > https://bugs.redsleeve.org about this and I'll check if it > builds without any additional patches on RSEL7 over the next > few days. > > Gordan > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users
