On 02/01/2016 12:39 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> On 2016-01-31 23:03, Jacco Ligthart wrote:
>> As some of you noticed, Redsleeve 6 is getting a bit behind with
>> updates.
>>
>> A while ago I made a complete set called 6.7. The idea was to drop some
>> old-and-not-used-anymore packages and create a complete set, in line
>> with the latest from upstream. This has not made it into a release yet,
>> the last show stopper is us not being able to build the latest firefox
>> for it.
>>
>> Question: what shall I do with the updates? create an update tree next
>> to the current 6.7 or fold them into the current 6.7 tree, as it is
>> still unreleased?
>
> If 6.7 base really is just 6.7 upstream release base, keep the updates
> separate. If what we have tagged as 6.7 is 6.7 plus some updates anyway,
> just fold the updates in, and deduplicate packages (only keep the latest
> version if the latest version works).

It has all updates till October 1st. as the release date was end of
July, there are indeed some updates already in 6.7. I'll fold the new
updates in.
>
>
> It would be nice to reduce all of EL6 to just one deduplicated repository
> and archive off the rest.

indeed that was the goal.

>
>> (it might take a couple of days before all is build. It is now happily
>> building libreoffice :) )
>
> Yeah, that takes a day or two even with decent hardware.
>
> Gordan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to