-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
It seems the recent debate with wxGTK shows an issue that is frequently recurring. Take wxGTK 2.8 for example. If you need 2.6 then having 2.8 intalled is not going to help you. While this may not be possible for all packages at least some of these issues could be solved if at the time there is a version jump a backward compatibility package is created. So when a wxGTK 2.8 package is released and there was a 2.6 package before. Then a minimal set of files could be put into a compat-wxGTK26 package. That might take care of dependencies. Or it might not. It is just a thought I had that I have not been able to put to the test (yet). While it is not very clean way of doing things it might solve at least some dependencies. It also means more work for the packagers. But the extra work might pay off. Hugo. - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFI3Uu2BvzDRVjxmYERAgMhAJ9OzJ4B+j7Hae7SKWtsRvSjtg5HLwCcCgF+ JjbPt0t6zOay1yGon6LRzHE= =5vBp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
