Christoph Maser wrote: Hello.
> No that is not the goal. I guess his intention was to express that you > don't have any rights to demand something. Ok, this is fair, I think. > Well i have to disapoint you your assumptions were wrong. Most (nearly > all) packages in rpmforge are not tested at all. A lot of packages do > not even build. And today i learned that there is dozens of missing > dependencies all aover the place (repoclosure output is > 700 lines). I really don't know this. I will testing rpmforge packages by myself before using them. > I did quite offensively! Noone from rpmforge team ever said it was > someone elses fault. But i have to say I have the impression some > users are overreacting a bit. Yes, I will calm down and will enable rpmforge repo in a few days, when everything works like common. But I also learned a lot from this discussion, that it is not recommended to use rpmforge on more or less critical systems. But I like to use rpmforge on CentOS clients with multimedia programs. Chris, thank you for all your explanations and for your endurance. regards Olaf _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
