If you start doing it for one package, it's a slippery path. Wine have written themselves out of the upstream vendors I'm not sure we should be any difference.
Manuel -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christoph Maser Sent: 09 January 2010 09:36 To: RPMForge Users List Subject: Re: [users] request: flex 2.5.33 or newer Am Samstag, den 09.01.2010, 03:19 +0100 schrieb MargoAndTodd: > Hi All, > > As of wine-1.1.36.tar.bz2, the "Wine" folks have added > a requirement for "flex 2.5.33 or newer" to their requirements > list to compile Wine. > > They will not budge on backing off on the requirement. > See: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21288#c3 > > Would you please consider doing a more modern RPM of > "flex" so we can compile wine-1.1.36.tar.bz2 under > CentOS 5.4? > > Many thanks, > -T Well usually we do not overwrite package which are shipped in core, I wonder if wine is a good enough reason for an exception. Chris financial.com AG Munich head office/Hauptsitz München: Maria-Probst-Str. 19 | 80939 München | Germany Frankfurt branch office/Niederlassung Frankfurt: Messeturm | Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49 | 60327 Frankfurt | Germany Management board/Vorstand: Dr. Steffen Boehnert | Dr. Alexis Eisenhofer | Dr. Yann Samson | Matthias Wiederwach Supervisory board/Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Dr. Ernst zur Linden (chairman/Vorsitzender) Register court/Handelsregister: Munich HRB 128 972 | Sales tax ID number/St.Nr.: DE205 370 553 _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
