Le 02/17/2016 01:23 AM, AlvaroOsvaldo a écrit :
I am worried, in previous versions of scilab, I implemented a medium
project for scientific computing with scilab at that time had many
memory leaks and had been a nightmare. With the new updates that was
fixed and this much better. But now I am implementing another project
involving massive image processing. And the three atoms for this, one
does not work, one does not load images but the manual says they can
do, and other charges but leak the computer's memory and it took me
longer skirting the problem than implementing the solution. And worse,
because this the system is much slower than it should. This atom
memory failure it has been known, however, despite it make
impraticable to use the atom for medium and large projects, makes
three years that no one gets the bug.
forge.scilab.org/index.php/p/IPD/issues/992/ There are high
expectations with Scilab 6 and I believe we will have a much better
platform. But for what you know, in the meantime we will run out of
many atoms, and this greatly reduces the possibility of working in
scilab. What is the future of Scilab? For now, the impression I have
is that the atoms are abandoned and without the atoms the usefulness
of scilab is reduced a lot.
Hi,
I think there are two issues here:
1) The sad state of image processing toolbox with Scilab. It's
terrrible. Image processing with Scilab is a nightmare. Every other
language I use is far better than Scilab in this area (even extremely
young language like Julia offers a better experience. The 3 toolboxes
are either broken, unmaintained or difficult (or impossible) to install.
And the experience is even worse under Linux (IPD for example requires a
very old version of opencv to be manually installed under Linux which is
a daunting task for most user and which introduces many compatibility
issues with other softwares relying on opencv).
2) The lack of information on the life (or lack of life) for a given
atoms module. I know some information is available on the atoms website,
but I've always found it difficult to determine whether the package was
long dead or under active development. There are some long dead modules
that are still listed alongside with actively maintained ones and that
show excellent rating. It's a bit confusing.
Concerning the first issue, image processing with scilab, I think a
basic core image support should be part of scilab.
Antoine
------------------------------------------------------------------------
View this message in context: What is the future of Scilab?
<http://mailinglists.scilab.org/What-is-the-future-of-Scilab-tp4033471.html>
Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list
archive
<http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Scilab-users-Mailing-Lists-Archives-f2602246.html>
at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
