Hi all
I see Scinotes supports "Execute file with echo" ... so I did that (and
stopped the execution in its tracks). This is the code which gives me an
invalid buffer error:
--> // ---- Change active directory to script directory ----
--> [units,typs,nams]=file(); // nams(1) = script file name incl. path
--> fpathname=strsplit(nams(1), [filesep()]); // disp(b($-1));
--> scriptpath = get_absolute_file_path(fpathname($));
--> chdir(scriptpath);
Invalid buffer.
--> // ---- READ CONFIG FILE ----
The scriptpath variable is empty. When I look at the commands, it seems
the logic has changes since 5.5 so that instead of nams(1) one should
use nams(2) instead, but nams(2) doesn't contain the script path.
Instead (on Windows 10) it contains a link to a temporary file in
AppData/Local/Temp ... and the file is named (randomly, I suppose):
LOAD_INTO_SCILAB-17 84290624451915792.sce
So - please let me know, how do I now determine where my script is
located? (So that I can save output data to the same folder)
Thanks.
P.S. It seems I still have an unresolved problem with the Prettify code
that I've copied into my script. I wonder if Pierre Vuillemin is willing
to help by providing suitable code for Scilab 6 - and please let me know
where (and how) to pick it up without errors.
/Claus
On 08-09-2017 19:47, Claus Futtrup wrote:
Hi all
First follow-up. I completely removed the entire section of Prettify
code, and all instances of calls to the prettify function was
commented out. This executes fine in Scilab 5.5.
In Scilab 6 I still get the "Invalid buffer." response, but now it can
execute repeatedly. I just gotta chase down what buffer, etc. ... you
know, the error which is not listed in the error table:
https://help.scilab.org/docs/6.0.0/en_US/error_table.html
Best regards,
Claus
On 08-09-2017 16:48, Claus Futtrup wrote:
Hi Christophe
Good points. I guess one thing I could do is to delete the entire
Prettify from my file (and not call Prettify). Then see if Scilab 6
complains.
It's weird, though, that the errors are prior to execution of any
code. I guess Scilab first "reads" the entire code somehow and if
there's anything less than perfect, it breaks and cannot start
stepping through the code.
/Claus
On 08-09-2017 09:43, Dang Ngoc Chan, Christophe wrote:
Hello,
De : Pierre Vuillemin
Envoyé : jeudi 7 septembre 2017 22:20
Or you may want to comment suspicious parts of your code until
there is no more error....
A very efficient way to isolate the error is to use dichotomy.
Normally, the core of your script should consist in calling functions.
So remove the first half of the functions and see if you get the error.
If not, remove the other half.
You can then isolate in which half your function is.
Remove then the first half of the problematic half etc.
If both fail, then the problematic part is in the core
And you can isolate it in the same way.
Regards
--
Christophe Dang Ngoc Chan
Mechanical calculation engineer
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail
in error), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
