Le 02/03/2020 à 16:45, Perrichon a écrit :
Ok but this is a strange way to handle backward compatibility
I agree. This is why i asked for confirmation to a second reviewer
before removing nbits,
when the first reviewer asked me to remove it.
nbits was never implemented (never actually used in the function), just
present as a dead input.
But it was not disturbing.
Now, i guess that sometimes it's useful to clean the code. I think that
the next input argument "aplay"
after nbits is (very) rarely used (it addresses "only" Linux and MacOS
users (15%), and only if
its default value is not convenient (? 5% of 15% ?). Most often, only
the first 2 arguments are used.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
