Thanks a lot. I see it. Tien Dang On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:56 AM Samuel Gougeon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > Le 19/05/2020 à 12:26, tien.dang a écrit : > > Dear all, > As title, Can I custom Mux and Demux block to have more than 32 ports, for > example: 64 ports as I need. > I try to re build source code base on Git repos but meet so many errors. > Thanks > Tien Dang > > I am not an xcos user, but what about the following proposals: > > - use several MUX whose outputs are branched to another MUX. The > output of this last one should be equivalent to the one of a big MUX. > Shouldn't it? > This "2-layer MUX set up" allows to "concatenate" up to 31*31 = 961 > input channels, and to "split" the positioning of blocks of inputs in a > more manageable way than with a single huge MUX block. > Couldn't a MUX be considered as a columns concatenator, each column > being a separate signal? So, concatenators might be nested in this way. > > - To build a big DEMUX, a somewhat symetric proposal: > - from the single input, extract some ranges of channels with one or > several EXTRACTOR blocks, with at most 31 bundled channels in the single > output. > - put a DEMUX after each EXTRACTOR, to split their channels as as > many outputs. > > These naive proposals should be tested. The 2-layer MUX setup looks to > work when the final output is connected to a simple scope: then there are > as many curves as primary inputs. > > > Could this match your requirements? > > Regards > Samuel > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
