Hi, Thank you for the explanations. They make me the atom philosophy clearer :-)
>> 2) I added the atoms repository http://atoms.scilab/org because the default >> one >> is http://atoms.scilab.org/6.1 and it gives nothing! > I guess that by "it gives nothing" you mean that you did not get any > emd_toolbox version installed. Yes, and I understand now it's rather good nothing was installed because the atoms "emd_toolbox" is not compatible with Scilab-6.1. > By the way, the behavior of the ATOMS server when no Scilab version is > specified in the repository URL would deserve either being documented, > or fixed. As far as i understand, then the user is completely free and > responsible of what it does. Yes, but I have to learn and I'm more irresponsible to do what I did :-) > In your case, by default the very first > emd_toolbox version 1.0 has been installed (why not. It could be the > last available one, instead...). Then the automatical choice of the > default version of the dependency (stftb) is more obscure... So, I think the best way it to use older Scilab version because - only too old emd_toolbox is "atomsInstalled" with Scilab-6.1 and not "atomsLoadable" - with http://atoms.scilab.org/5.3 repository, the atomsLoad() function alway gives "bad library path" - I'm not able to start with library source code Two questions: - Which Scilab version should I used? (only 5.5.2 or 5.1.1 are available on http://www.scilab.org) - Is the message "bad libray path" given by atomsLoad() mean there is a compatiliby issues? If yes, why does atomsInstall() intall without any error while atomsLoad() give errors? Thank for all, -- Jean-Yves _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
