michal.maczka wrote:
> won't it be simple just to have:
>
<sources>
> <source>
> <type>java</type>
> <path>src/java</path>
> </source>
>
> <source>
> <type>cactus</type>
> <path>src/cactus</path>
> </source>
>
> <source>
> <type>test</type>
> <path>src/test/java</path>
> <includes>
> <include>**/*Test.java</include>
> </includes>
> <excludes>
> <exclude>**/RepositoryTest.java</exclude>
> <exclude>**/JAXPTest.java</exclude>
> </excludes>
> </source>
>
> <source>
> <type>aspect</type>
> <path>src/ascpects</path>
> </source>
>
> <source>
> <type>native</type>
<path>src/cpp</path>
> </source>
</sources>
> and then
>
> <resources>
> <resource>
> <type>java<type>
> .....
> </resource>
> <resource>
> <type>test<type>
> .....
> </resource>
>
> ...
> <resources>
I like your proposal very much. I think it's clear, orthogonal, has
natural space for extension (with plugins, of course) and translate to
convenient Jelly (applying JAXP exprs on pom) and Java interfaces.
I give my non-commiter + to the idea.
R.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
