On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 04:16, Rafal Krzewski wrote: > Colin Sampaleanu wrote:
> >> I'm not really in favour of this and much prefer the way the antlr > >> plugin works. I would like to see most of the <build/> element removed > >> and replaced with a place where you can define plugin settings if they > >> are required. We started this a long time ago and there was a proposal > >> that just never got implemented. > > This made me think... Maybe the <sources> section of the POM is > completly redundant? Yes, I've always chatted with people whether this should be completely removed or left for 'visibility' reasons. It's not readily apparent what's going on if those elements are removed from the POM. The idea being making an exception for ease of comprehension. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
