On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 17:11, Rafal Krzewski wrote: > > I agree. If you dedcide to depend on something, then basicly it's > runtime dependencies should become your runtime dependencies, shouldn't > they? In this light, I'm wondering if the the 'transitive' hint is at > neccessary at all!
I believe it is not. I'm still working on the transitive deps doc from yesterday. > > I don't see any reason why would we need things like: war.bundle.transitive > > Why to complicate things? And then you need special markup in other projects > > I don't think that you should expect such meta-information there nor you > > will be able to control it (some of them won't be yours) > > That .transitive thing was a plain silly idea. What I really meant was > <kind> and <transitive-kind>, but that is irrelevant now. > > R. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
