On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 04:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jason, > > I extracted my problem out into the smallest example possible. Its attached. If > you extract it into a dir and invoke maven, it should first jar:install base, the > jar:install toplevel. > > This works for beta 8 but not beta 9. What ya reckon?
This is when we switched the default dependency resolver from the commons-graph one to the werkz one so I'll take a peek later when I get a moment. I have to run off right now. > Thanks, > Mike. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ext [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 01 July, 2003 11:07 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor > > dependencies in Beta > > 9 > > > > > > Don't get it Jason. Are you saying all dependencies should > > be specified as follows in beta 9: > > > > <dependency> > > <groupId>junit</junit> > > <artifactId>junit</artifactId> > > <version>3.8.1</junit> > > </dependency> > > > > I tried this for one of the reactor-generated-dependencies > > but it didn't work. > > > > Is there a real-life deployment of Maven that uses > > reactor-generated-dependencies that I can look at? > > > > Thanks, > > Mike. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ext Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 30 June, 2003 18:07 > > > To: Maven Users List > > > Subject: Re: "Unsatisfied dependencies" for reactor > > > dependencies in Beta > > > 9 > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 09:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I just moved from beta 8 to beta 9. I have about 20 > > > components that are built with the reactor. Beta 9 complains > > > that these are unsatisfied dependencies - it does not > > > understand that they are to be built from source. This > > > worked with Beta 8. What should I do to get this working? > > > > > > I haven't tested this but most likely it is the way your > > dependencies > > > are stated. Are you using <groupId> and <artifactId> for your > > > dependencies? > > > > > > The ordering is determined by the relationship amongst the found > > > dependencies. I haven't tested this but we moved away from > > > simply using > > > <id> for the dependencies and simply using that might be causing the > > > problem. > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike. > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > > > jvz. > > > > > > Jason van Zyl > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > > > > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational > > > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. > > > > > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
