On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 22:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jamie McCrindle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/07/2003 10:47:38 > PM: > > > apologies, > > > > it seems i have overstepped my bounds, this was meant to be a followup > to a > > mailing list discussion about standardising the POM that dion challenged > me > > to do something about. this probably wasn't what he meant... > Yes, it was. But I don't think you've overstepped your bounds. Anyone > should be able to talk to anyone else about Maven regardless of whether > it's in the context of a JSR or not.
No, it is not if it in any way represents Maven. I doubt the JSR fellow gave a rat's ass about Maven anyway. Discussion is one thing, of course there isn't a problem with that, but approaching a JSR lead as even vaguely representing the interests of Maven I don't think is right. > There was a discussion up here that Jason obviously missed. > > > i'll try but it's just so good i just feel like i want to tell everyone. > ;-) > > -- > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
