On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 22:45, Alwyn Schoeman wrote: > I think a better solution would be for an extended vote option where > in addition to voting for an issue, the user can either supply a > version in which it would be good to have it fixed or better, a > measure of how important it is.
Definitely. I'm all for fielding requests from users and using JIRA's ranking system. Then using that information to help decide what gets assigned as an official addition/fix for a particular version. > The last could obviously be done by a combination between voting and > the priority of the issue. Currently the priority is set to whoever > last changed it by editing, but maybe it should be the result of > priorities provided by all voters. > > Maybe to a proposal to the Jira folks... > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:21:21AM +0800, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 22:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Jira users can now edit issues. > > > -1 > > > > I do not want users adding stuff that officially gets accepted as going > > into a version. That's just silly and that list will get out of control. > > They influence the selection they don't select. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
