Of course, while this extssh protocol seems to do what I want, it's not
actually providing anything in the way of reports :) And cvs2cl.pl shows
that I made a change on 2003-08-04. Arse.


On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:

>
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Andy Jefferson wrote:
>
> > On Monday 04 Aug 2003 17:58, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > Ack. It no longer supports this connection method? Any reason why?
> >
> > > On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > <connection>scm:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cvs:genjava-core</connec
> > > >tion> This is bad.
> >
> > Errrm, because you missed a colon out of your CVS line ? (between 'cvs' and
> > 'hen')
> >
> > scm:cvs:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:....
> >
>
> Nope. Tried that. I always found in the past that the : screwed things up.
> Adding the : now makes no difference.
>
> Maybe it allows ':ext:' or ':extssh:' as a protocol.
>
> Ah. :ext: seems to work, however when on the same machine it asks for the
> password etc now. Used to be that the connection I had above would work
> like 'ext' when on a remote machine and like 'local' on the local machine.
>
> 'extssh' appears to be this protocol. :) So I have to go from:
>
> scm:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cvs:genjava-core  [works in b7 and
> before]
>
> scm:cvs:extssh:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cvs:genjava-core [b8 onwards]
>
> Thanks for all the help,
>
> Hen
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to