The reactor is a tag, not a plugin.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
"Nicolas FRANK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/08/2003 12:07:41
AM:
> Reactor has not much to do with CI, but it allows to build with only one
goal
> many projects...
>
> The reactor is a plugin that can order dependencies between project. For
> exemple if you have a project A that depend on project B to be build
(i.e. A
> has a dependancy on the artifact generated by project B), you can use
the
> reactor giving him the 2 project and ask for calling build on each one.
the
> ractor will take care calling B before A.
>
> Ex:
>
> <m:reactor basedir="${basedir}" includes="**/project.xml"
excludes="**/CVS/
> **/project.xml/,global/project.xml,project.xml" goals="install"
> banner="Installation" ignoreFailures="false"/>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Nelson, Scott (MAN - Corporate) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoy� : jeudi 14 ao�t 2003 15:55
> � : 'Maven Users List'
> Objet : RE: Continuous integration question
>
>
> Emmanuel-
> The most referenced article on CI is one by Martin Fowler, almost
everyone
> who talks about CI references it.
> http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html
>
> Here is another good article on continuous integration and an example of
> setting it up.
>
> http://www.sys-con.com/java/article.cfm?id=1945
>
> Basically in a nutshell continuous integration is an automated build
process.
> Rather than doing the build right before a deployment, it can be
nightly,
> hourly, or in some cases when code gets checked into a repository. Gump
> itself (I am not a Gump expert by any means) is just an application that
> helps out with the scheduling part of kicking off the build scripts. The
> build scripts could be based on a number of different methods. Some
people
> just have nightly build scripts that they kick off manually while others
use
> something like Gump, anthill, or CruiseControl. Gump, Anthill, and
> CruiseControl are just applications that developers by giving them the
> ability to schedule builds. They don't replace maven but many of them
use
> maven when running their build process.
>
> I don't have a lot of experience with the reactor someone else will have
to
> fill that part in.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emmanuel Boudrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Continous integration question
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm a little lost ;) ... Does Maven reactor replace Gump ? If no, what
are
> the differences between Maven reactor and Gump ?
>
> Thx,
> -emmanuel
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
