I think people call that style of development "inplace".. war internal makes me think I shouldn't run it, that the war goal runs it somehow. I like the war inplace idea.
Here is a question. I am using Eclipse, and the sysdeo tomcat plugin. It would be nice if I ran war:inplace to not run the unit tests. But, if I run war:webapp, I want to run them.. I don't know if some trickery with maven.test.skip could be used? Typically I would use war:inplace when I edit .html, css, or other non Junit tested code. Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:27 AM > To: 'Maven Users List' > Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Maven Tomcat Deployment Plugin > > > > There was also some discussion of 'in-place' webapp > > development on the > > list a couple of weeks ago, I think those goals could be > > usefully added. > > I've written a war:fill goal that I was going to commit in the near > future. > It basically runs war:webapp with maven.war.target.dir = > maven.war.src. > Since most of the source files = dest files, this works, it copies > resources > and deps into /WEB-INF/classes and /WEB-INF/lib, and allows you to > continue > hooking you own goals onto war:webapp and have them apply. I > also edited > war:clean to clean up afterwards. > > Can anyone think of a batter target name than war:fill? Is war:inplace > better? war:internal? > > - Brett > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
