"JACOB, ERIC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/08/2003 06:07:07 AM:
> Hi all, > > Why Maven doesn't use Forrest for project website generation ? All IMHO: 1) Forrest came after Maven 2) Maven docs came out of Anakia, Forrest out of Cocoon 3) Forrest is heavy in terms of size. 4) Forrest is slow. > It would be interesting to see a consistent Apache website and Forrest has > very great festures (based on Cocoon, static and dynamic web application, > etc.). Maven is great too, but why not standardize Apache website ? You > could use Maven for project management and Forrest for project > documentation... 5) The forrest look and feel is being used in Anakia docs quite well by Ant. Making consistent look and feel doesn't require standardising on Forrest. 6) It's open source. If someone wants it, they can do it. 7) What we have works ok -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
