On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:53 pm, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 21:31, John Farrell wrote:
> > I definitely expected pom.id to give me just "mp-util", instead of
> > "mp-util:mp-util". Why are my expectations wrong?
> The id has been something that has been used internally for a while now.
> What you are looking for is ${pom.artifactId}. ${pom.id} is currently
> equal to ${pom.groupId}:${pom.artifactId}.
Thanks jvz & dIon, I get it now.
John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
