How about including the version number in the file name, along with RELEASE? For example, myproject-1.0-RELEASE, myproject-2.0-RELEASE, myproject-2.1-SNAPSHOT, etc.
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, at 14:19:44 [GMT +0700] Jason Dillon wrote: > Works, though which release? A project may have a stable 2.0 and a > legacy 1.0, both are releases IMO. Just a naming confusion problem. > I like the stable/unstable tags which debian uses. > But I don't care too much, just that there is some link that always > points to the latest release as to reduce dependency version > maintenance for a project which always wants the latest and greatest > version of something. > --jason > On Thursday, September 4, 2003, at 07:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >> How about -RELEASE? >> >> -- >> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting >> Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ >> >> >> Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/09/2003 03:43:08 >> AM: >> >>> If there was a latest tag or something sure... which is what I really >>> want... a latest release link. >>> >>> --jason -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
