Mikael Lundgren wrote on Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:43 PM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> It'd be good to change the regexp code to match both versions. --
>> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
>> Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
>>
>
> Yes, it would I guess. I have tried to create such an expression and
> even got it to work using the ORO package demonstrator at the jakarta
> site. However I can't get it to work with the regexp package.
>
> Now I officially give up :-( This is starting to take way too
> much time
> for something that someone with better knowledge about regexp probably
> can fix in minutes.
Should work:
"^r(ev)? (\\d+):\\s+" + // revision number
Regards,
J�rg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
