*Organization - has name, no id *Repository - no name or id *Branch - adding name and id means it == Version, but maybe it should? *MailingList - has name, no id *Contributor - has name, no id; adding id means == Developer *License - has name, no id *Dependency - has id, no name *Build - neither *Report - neither
Does not necessarily make sense that they all should, nor should code necessarily be directly reflected in XSD. But for some (Organization, Branch, Contributor, License, Dependency?) it makes sense???
Do you want the comments issue entered in JIRA?
jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK,
comments is missing from the XSD and should be present. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jeffrey Bonevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/11/2003 01:41:44 PM:
I am working on the POM editor for mevenide's Eclipse plugin. Hoping someone in the know could answer this question:
The License class has properties: name, distribution, url, and comments.
Comments is not discussed in the reference docs, nor is it in the current version of the XSD for maven's project.xml file.
So is comment a deprecated property or just an oversight of XSD and ref docs?
jeff
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
