> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 11:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R�f. : elementary problem with dependency.
> 
> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> Shouldn't the <id>module-ejb</id> be a 
> <artifactId>module-ejb</artifactId>
> ?
> 
> I think when it's an <id> the type is ignored and supposed to be jar.
> 
> Julien
> 
> 
Sure he should use <artifactId>. <id> was deprecated some time ago.

Michal

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to