I see, The setting I have for publish JUnit results is: **/target/surefire-reports/*.xml and I have not had issues using either our old ant emma setup or the new maven with clover setup
I have made use of clover for code coverage reports as it will merge them at a top module level for me where as Emma and cobertura do not (also cobertura always seems to report 0% code coverage for some reason, but I never bothered to look into that. Anyway I dont have the duplicate test issue and have Maven run from ant with a freestyle Hudson project just to really be difficult :) > Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:51:29 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Surefire/Cobertura roll-up reports? > > Adam Purkiss wrote: > > As for surefire - no idea, but using Hudson as our CI tool I have it setup > > to "roll up" the Junit results to a top level using its reporting. > > > We use Hudson, as well, but we've noticed that between Surefire and > Cobertura, we end up with two or three "copies" of each test result. > So, it appears like we have 2 to 3 times more unit tests than we really > do. I guess it depends on what Hudson is rolling up. Perhaps I'm using > the plugins in a way that I should not be. I'm trying to satisfy both > the needs of the development team in getting code built and deployed to > a test server (where we then come back and run some automated > integration tests through Maven with Selenium) and the desires of > management who really love to look at the pretty reports. :-) It was > actually this discrepancy in the Hudson rollup that prompted my question > in the first place. Otherwise, that's a great suggestion. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive email from all of your webmail accounts. http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9671356
